Federal Court of Australia
Yau's Entertainment Pty Limited v Asia Television Limited [2002] FCAFC 78 Yau's Entertainment Pty Limited v Asia Television Limited [2002] FCA 338
NOTE: CHANGES TO THE MEDIUM NEUTRAL CITATION (MNC) The Federal Court adopted a new medium neutral citation (FCAFC) for Full Court judgments effective from 1 January 2002. Single Judge judgments will not be affected and will retain the FCA medium neutral citation. The transitional arrangements are as follows: * All Full Court judgments delivered prior to 1 January 2002 will retain the FCA medium neutral citation.
* All Full Court judgments delivered between 1 January 2002 to 30 April 2002 have been assigned parallel medium neutral citations in both the FCA and FCAFC series.
* All Full Court judgments delivered from 1 May 2002 will contain the FCAFC medium neutral citation only.
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA Yau's Entertainment Pty Limited v Asia Television Limited [2002] FCA 338
CONTRACT – licence agreement – agreement contained in a letter – implication of terms in a written agreement which is incomplete on its face – whether terms sought to be implied were necessary for the reasonable or effective operation of the letter agreement – whether agreement was validly terminated TRADE MARKS – application to remove trade mark for non-use – whether registered owner used the trade mark in relation to its goods – whether there was authorised use of the trade mark in relation to goods under the control of the registered owner Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) s 52, 53 Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) s 7(1), 7(3), 8(1), 92(4)(b) Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) s 115(2), 115(4) Byrne v Australian Airlines Ltd (1995) 185 CLR 410 referred to, applied Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority of NSW (1981-1982) 149 CLR 337 referred to Khoury v Government Insurance Office of NSW (1983-1984) 165 CLR 622 referred to BP Refinery (Westernport) Pty Ltd v Shire of Hastings (1977) 180 CLR 266 applied Hospital Products Ltd v United States Surgical Corporation (1984) 156 CLR 41 applied Hawkins v Clayton (1987-1988) 164 CLR 539 applied Moneywood Pty Ltd v Salamon Nominees Pty Ltd (2001) 177 ALR 390 referred to Breen v Williams (1995-1996) 186 CLR 71 applied Harrods Limited v Harrods (Buenos Aires) Limited [1997] FSR 420 considered Society of Lloyd's v Clementson [1995] Lloyd's Reinsurance Law Reports 307 considered Roxborough v Rothmans of Pall Mall Australia Ltd [2001] HCA 68 applied Secured Income Real Estate (Australia) Ltd v St Martins Investments Proprietary Ltd (1979) 144 CLR 596 applied Luxor (Eastbourne) Ltd v Cooper [1941] AC 108 considered Klahn v Audeh [2001] WASCA 336 applied Truth About Motorways Pty Ltd v Macquarie Infrastructure Investment Management Limited (1999-2000) 169 ALR 616 referred to Pioneer Kabushiki Kaishi v Registrar of Trade Marks (1977) 137 CLR 670 applied Halsbury's Laws of Australia Vol 6 [110-2145]
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate