Federal Court of Australia
Gomez v State Bank of New South Wales Limited [2002] FCAFC 101 Gomez v State Bank of New South Wales Limited [2002] FCA 442
NOTE: CHANGES TO THE MEDIUM NEUTRAL CITATION (MNC) The Federal Court adopted a new medium neutral citation (FCAFC) for Full Court judgments effective from 1 January 2002. Single Judge judgments will not be affected and will retain the FCA medium neutral citation. The transitional arrangements are as follows: * All Full Court judgments delivered prior to 1 January 2002 will retain the FCA medium neutral citation.
* All Full Court judgments delivered between 1 January 2002 to 30 April 2002 have been assigned parallel medium neutral citations in both the FCA and FCAFC series.
* All Full Court judgments delivered from 1 May 2002 will contain the FCAFC medium neutral citation only.
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Gomez v State Bank of New South Wales Limited [2002] FCA 442
BANKRUPTCY – appeal from decision of primary judge dismissing an application to set aside a bankruptcy notice – debtor's claim that secured creditor had sold mortgaged properties at an undervalue and in breach of a duty of care as mortgagee – tests applicable to whether duty of care discharged – whether debtor had shown prima facie case for relief by way of counterclaim, set-off or cross-demand.
Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) subs 40(1), 41(7)
Ebert v The Union Trustee Company of Australia Ltd (1960) 104 CLR 346 applied Guss v Johnstone (2000) 171 ALR 598 applied Kennedy v De Trafford [1897] AC 180 referred to Hawkesbury Valley Developments Pty Ltd v Custom Credit Corporation Ltd (1995) NSW ConvR 55-731 cited Stone v Farrow Mortgage Services (in liq) [1999] NSWCA 435 referred to Beecham Group Limited v Bristol Laboratories Pty Limited (1967) 118 CLR 618 referred to Cuckmere Brick Co Ltd v Mutual Finance Limited [1971] Ch 949 considered Medforth v Blake [2000] Ch 86 considered Pendlebury v Colonial Mutual Life Assurance Society Limited (1912) 13 CLR 676 referred to Forsyth v Blundell (1973) 129 CLR 477 referred to Commercial and General Acceptance Corporation Limited v Nixon (1981) 152 CLR 491 referred to Banque Commerciale SA (In liq) v Akhil Holdings Limited (1990) 169 CLR 279 cited Water Board v Moustakas (1988) 180 CLR 491 cited State Bank of New South Wales Ltd v Chia & Anor (2000) 50 NSWLR 587 approved
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate