Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Desktop Marketing Systems Pty Ltd v Telstra Corporation Limited [2002] FCAFC 112 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY – subsistence of copyright – respondent produces telephone directories requiring expenditure of significant time and financial resources – whether the factual compilations comprising the directories meet the threshold requirement of originality in Australian copyright law – whether the headings books developed by the respondent attract copyright protection. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY – infringement of copyright – whether appellant reproduced a substantial part of the respondent's copyright telephone directories and headings books in appellant's database – actual copying from directories and headings in directories admitted – whether visual similarity an essential element of infringement.
United States Constitution, Art I, §8, cl 8 Commonwealth of Australia Constitution, s 51(xviii)
Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) ss 10(1), 14, 31, 32 Copyright Act 1911 (UK) ss 1(1), 35 Copyright Act of 1976 (US) §§ 101, 102, 103 Copyright Act of 1909 (US) § 5 Copyright Act 1985 (Can) s 2 North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act 1993 (Can) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 25(2) Telecommunications Act 1997 (Cth), ss 3(1), 52, 56, 57, 63 Circuit Layouts Act 1989 (Cth) Copyright and Rights in Databases Regulations 1997 (UK)
Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works discussed Berlin Convention 1908
Carrier Licence Conditions (Telstra Corporation Limited) Declaration 1997, cll 9, 10
Victoria Park Racing and Recreation Grounds Co Ltd v Taylor (1937) 58 CLR 479 discussed Feist Publications Inc v Rural Telephone Service Co Inc 499 US 340 (1991), considered Matthewson v Stockdale (1806) 12 Ves 270 (33 ER 103) discussed Longman v Winchester (1809) 16 Ves Jun 269 (33 ER 987) discussed Walter v Lane [1900] AC 539 followed Spiers v Brown (1858) 6 WR 352 discussed Hotten v Arthur (1863) 1 H & M 603 (71 ER 264) discussed Kelly v Morris (1866) LR 1 Eq 697 followed Scott v Stanford (1867) LR 3 Eq 718 discussed Morris v Ashbee (1868) LR 7 Eq 34 followed Cox v Land and Water Journal Company (1869) LR 9 Eq 324 discussed Morris v Wright (1870) LR 5 Ch App 279 discussed Hogg v Scott (1874) LR 18 Eq 444 discussed Dicks v Yates (1881) 18 Ch D 76 discussed Ager v Peninsular & Oriental Steam Navigation Co (1884) 26 Ch D 637 discussed Macmillan & Co Ltd v Suresh Chunder Deb (1890) 17 I LR (Calc Series) 951 distinguished Macmillan & Co Ltd v K & J Cooper (1923) LR 51 Ind App 109 discussed T M Hall & Co v Whittington & Co (1892) 18 VLR 525 discussed Leslie v J Young & Sons [1894] AC 335 discussed Collis v Cater, Stoffell & Fortt Ltd (1898) 78 LT 613 discussed Sands & McDougall Pty Ltd v Robinson (1917) 23 CLR 49 followed H Blacklock & Co Ltd v C Arthur Pearson Ltd [1915] 2 Ch 376 discussed Weatherby & Sons v International Horse Agency & Exchange Ltd [1910] 2 Ch 297 discussed University of London Press Ltd v University Tutorial Press Ltd [1916] 2 Ch 601 cited Real Estate Institute of New South Wales v Wood (1923) 23 SR (NSW) 349 discussed Exxon Corporation v Exxon Insurance Consultants International Ltd [1982] Ch 119 cited Hollinrake v Truswell [1894] 3 Ch 420 cited Cambridge University Press v University Tutorial Press (1928) 45 RPC 335 discussed Canterbury Park Race Course Co v Hopkins (1931) 49 SR (NSW) 27 discussed Mander v O'Brien [1934] SASR 87 discussed Odham's Press Ltd v London and Provincial Sporting News Agency (1929) Ltd [1935] Ch 672 discussed G A Cramp & Sons Ltd v Frank Smythson Ltd [1944] AC 329 cited Winterbottom for the Western Australian Turf Club v Wintle (1947) 50 WALR 58 discussed Purefoy Engineering Co Ltd v Sykes Boxall & Co Ltd (1955) 72 RPC 89 (PC) cited Football League Ltd v Littlewoods Pools Ltd [1959] 1 Ch 637 cited John Fairfax & Sons Pty Ltd v Australian Consolidated Press Ltd [1960] SR (NSW) 413 discussed Ladbroke (Football) Ltd v William Hill (Football) Ltd [1964] 1 WLR 273 (HL) followed Australian Consolidated Press Ltd v Morgan (1965) 112 CLR 483 discussed Warwick Film Productions Ltd v Eisinger [1969] Ch 508 discussed Elanco Products Ltd v Mandops (Agrochemical Specialists) Ltd [1979] FSR 46 discussed Mirror Newspapers Ltd v Queensland Newspapers Pty Ltd [1982] Qd R 305 discussed Ogden Industries Pty Ltd v Kis (Australia) Pty Ltd (1982) 62 FLR 241 referred to Computer Edge Pty Ltd v Apple Computer Inc (1986) 161 CLR 171 cited Kalamazoo (Aust) Pty Ltd v Compact Business Systems Pty Ltd (1984) 84 FLR 101 referred to Interlego AG v Tyco Industries Inc [1989] 1 AC 217 discussed Waterlow Publishers Ltd v Rose (1989) 17 IPR 493 cited Waterlow Directories Ltd v Reed Information Services Ltd (1990) 20 IPR 69 cited Ibcos Computers Ltd v Barclays Mercantile Highland Finance Ltd (1994) 29 IPR 25 followed Bookmakers' Afternoon Greyhound Services Ltd v Wilf Gilbert (Staffordshire) Ltd [1994] FSR 723 discussed Erica Vale Pty Ltd v Thompson & Morgan (Ipswich) Ltd (1994) AIPC §91-068 referred to Autospin (Oil Seals) Ltd v Beehive Spinning (a firm) [1995] RPC 683 followed A-One Accessory Imports Pty Ltd v Off Road Imports Pty Ltd (1996) 65 FCR 478 discussed Skybase Nominees Pty Ltd v Fortuity Pty Ltd (1996) 36 IPR 529 cited Milwell Pty Ltd v Olympic Amusements Pty Ltd (1999) 85 FCR 436 referred to Acohs Pty Ltd v R A Bashford Consulting Pty Ltd (1997) 144 ALR 528 referred to Harpur v Lambourne (1999) 45 IPR 213 referred to Autocaps (Aust) Pty Ltd v Pro-kit Pty Ltd (1999) 46 IPR 339 referred to Data Access Corporation v Powerflex Services Pty Ltd (1999) 202 CLR 1 followed T R Flanagan Smash Repairs Pty Ltd v Jones (2000) 102 FCR 181 referred to Sampson v Brokensha and Shaw Ltd (1935) 37 WALR 90 referred to Burlington's Home Shopping Ltd v Chibber (1995) Patent & Trademark Cases 278 referred to The British Horseracing Board Ltd v William Hill Organization Ltd (2001) 51 IPR 488 referred to Lamb v Evans [1892] 3 Ch 462 cited Autodesk Inc v Dyason (No 2) (1993) 176 CLR 300 applied Grain Pool of Western Australia v Commonwealth (2000) 74 ALJR 548 followed Key Publications, Inc v Chinatown Today Publishing Enterprises, Inc 945 F 2d 509 (2d Cir 1991) referred to Bellsouth Advertising & Publishing Corp v Donnelly Information Publishing Inc 999 F 2d 1436 (11th Cir 1993) referred to Tele-Direct (Publications) Inc v American Business Information, Inc (1997) 154 DLR (4th) 328 considered Francis Day & Hunter Ltd v Bron [1963] Ch 587 (CA) cited S W Hart & Co Pty Ltd v Edwards Hot Water Systems (1985) 159 CLR 466 cited Jefferys v Boosey (1854) 4 HLC 815 cited Hanfstaengl v HR Baines & Co Ltd [1895] AC 20 cited Blackie & Sons Ltd v Lothian Book Publishing Co Pty Ltd (1921) 29 CLR 396 cited Autodesk Inc v Dyason (1992) 173 CLR 330 cited Designers Guild Ltd v Russell Williams (Textiles) Ltd [2001] FSR 113 referred to Vella v Cummins (2001) 53 IPR 538 cited Newspaper Licensing Agency Ltd v Marks & Spencer Plc [2001] 3 All ER 977 cited Boosey v Whight [1900] 1 Ch 122 cited Cuisenaire v Reed [1963] VR 719 cited Lewis v Fullarton (1839) 2 Beav 6 (48 ER 1089) The Demerara Turf Club Ltd v Phang (1963) 6 WIR 177 cited British Columbia Jockey Club v Standen (1985) 8 CPR (3d) 283 cited Pacific Gaming Pty Ltd v Aristocrat Leisure Industries Pty Ltd (2002) AIPC §91-759 cited Chilton v Progress Printing and Publishing Company [1895] 2 Ch 29 cited The Trade-Mark Cases 100 US 82 (1879) cited Nintendo Co Ltd v Centronics Systems Pty Ltd (1994) 181 CLR 134 cited Kregos v Associated Press 937 F 2d 700 (2d Cir 1991) cited CCC Information Services v Maclean Hunter Market Report, Inc 44 F 3d 61 (2d Cir 1994) cited Independent Television Productions Ltd v Time Out Ltd [1964] FSR 64 cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate