Loevski v Australian Securities & Investments Commission [2002] FCAFC 116

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Loevski v Australian Securities & Investments Commission

[2002] FCAFC 116

YAKOV LOEVSKI v AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES AND INVESTMENTS COMMISSION and STEVEN SHERMAN V1167 OF 2001 CARR, MOORE & NORTH JJ 7 MAY 2002 MELBOURNE

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V1167 OF 2001

BETWEEN: YAKOV LOEVSKI

Applicant

AND: AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES AND INVESTMENTS COMMISSION

First Respondent

STEVEN SHERMAN

Second Respondent

JUDGES: CARR, MOORE & NORTH JJ

DATE OF ORDER: 7 MAY 2002

WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE

THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The time for the applicant to apply for leave to appeal from the orders made by Marshall J on 6 December 2001 be extended to 29 January 2002. 2. Leave to appeal against those orders be refused. 3. The applicant pay the respondents' costs of the application for leave to extend time and for leave to appeal. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V1167 OF 2001

BETWEEN: YAKOV LOEVSKI

Applicant

AND: AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES AND INVESTMENTS COMMISSION

First Respondent

STEVEN SHERMAN

Second Respondent

JUDGES: CARR, MOORE & NORTH JJ

DATE: 7 MAY 2002

PLACE: MELBOURNE

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

THE COURT:

introduction 1 In this matter the applicant appeared for himself. He is originally from Russia and does not speak much English. Accordingly, it is difficult to ascertain from the papers prepared and filed by him precisely what relief he seeks from this Court. 2 However, we think it is reasonable to infer, and we do so infer, that the applicant seeks an extension of time in which to apply for leave to appeal from interlocutory orders made by Marshall J on 6 December 2001. If time be extended, the applicant seeks leave to appeal from those orders.