Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WADA v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCAFC 202
MIGRATION - protection visa - whether Tribunal wrongly characterised applicant's case and thereby failed to consider his case based on political opinion – witness not present at hearing due to administrative oversight – Tribunal invited applicant to rely on written statement of witness – no statement supplied – whether Tribunal obliged to hear evidence of witness not present at hearing due to administrative oversight – whether Tribunal correctly applied "real chance" test – whether Tribunal entitled to rely on old sources of information – status of UNHCR Handbook
Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 5(1), 36, 426(2), 426(3), 476(1)(e), 476(1)(g) W375/01A v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 379, [2002] FCAFC 89distinguished WACW v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCAFC 155 at [17] followed Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees Handbook on Procedures and Criteria for Determining Refugee Status 1992 APPELLANT WADA OF 2001 v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS W 574 of 2001 GRAY, RD NICHOLSON AND EMMETT JJ 25 JUNE 2002 PERTH
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY W 574 of 2001
ON APPEAL FROM A SINGLE JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: APPELLANT WADA OF 2001
APPELLANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGES: GRAY, RD NICHOLSON AND EMMETT JJ
DATE OF ORDER: 25 JUNE 2002
WHERE MADE: PERTH
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The appeal be dismissed. 2. The appellant pay the respondent's costs of the appeal. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate