Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Hart v Commissioner of Taxation [2002] FCAFC 222
INCOME TAX – whether taxpayer entitled to a deduction of compound interest on a split loan taken for purchase of a new family home while retaining former family home as a rental property – whether compound interest, like ordinary interest, an allowable deduction under s 51(1) Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) or s 8-1 Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth). INCOME TAX – whether loan arrangement where split into a home loan portion and an investment loan portion resulting in an overall tax benefit is a scheme to which Pt IVA Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) applies – dominant purpose considered having regard to the eight factors in s 177D(1) Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) – commercial purpose of transaction weighed against income tax advantage.
Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) ss 51(1), 177A(1), 177C(1), 177D, 177F(1) Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth) s 8-1
Lunney v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1958) 100 CLR 478 cited Handley v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1981) 148 CLR 182 cited Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Cooper (1991) 29 FCR 177cited Fletcher v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1991) 173 CLR 1 discussed Ure v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1981) 34 ALR 237cited Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Phillips (1978) 20 ALR 607 cited Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Roberts & Smith (1992) 37 FCR 246 cited Magna Alloys and Research Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (1980) 49 FLR 183 discussed Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Peabody (1994) 181 CLR 359 referred to Inland Revenue Commissioners v Brebner [1967] 2 AC 18 discussed Commissioner of Taxation v Spotless Services Ltd (1996) 186 CLR 404 discussed Commissioner of Taxation v Consolidated Press Holdings Ltd (2001) 179 ALR 625 cited Eastern Nitrogen Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation 2001 ATC 4164 considered Attorney-General's Department v Cockcroft (1986) 10 FCR 180 cited Frank Lyon Co v United States (1978) 435 US 561 referred to Metal Manufactures Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation 99 ATC 5229 referred to Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Metal Manufactures Ltd 2001 ATC 4152 considered
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate