Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NAAV v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCAFC 228 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW – validity of privative clause enacted by s 474 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – whether privative clause is inconsistent with s 71, or s 75(iii) and (v) of the Constitution. ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – operation of privative clause – application of Hickman principle of statutory interpretation to privative clauses – application of Hickman principle of construction to s 474 of Migration Act 1958 (Cth). MIGRATION – power to grant protection visas – whether use of undisclosed independent information by Refugee Review Tribunal in a manner adverse to appellant, and contrary to assurances, constituted breach of rules of natural justice – whether s 474 applies to protect the decision to affirm the Minister's decision to refuse the application for a protection visa from review. MIGRATION – power to grant protection visas – where Refugee Review Tribunal misidentified the persons by whom the appellant claimed to have been persecuted – whether s 474 applies to protect the decision to affirm the Minister's decision to refuse the application for a protection visa from review. MIGRATION – power to grant Family (Residence) visas – where alleged that Migration Review Tribunal failed to consider that appellant provided financial or emotional assistance to a 'special need relative' so as to entitle appellant to visa – whether s 474 applied so as to protect the decision to affirm the Minister's decision to refuse the application for a Family (Residence) visa from review. MIGRATION – power to cancel permanent spouse visa – where visa cancelled while holder outside Australia, and holder detained as an unlawful non-citizen on return to Australia – where Minister's delegate cancelled visa under s 128 because she was satisfied that the grant of the visa was in contravention of the Act, but that satisfaction was affected by an error of law – whether s 474 applied so as to protect the cancellation decision (and consequent decision to detain) from review. MIGRATION – power to revoke cancellation of Business Entry visa – where visa cancelled while holder outside Australia, and decision to refuse to revoke the cancellation pursuant to s 131 made in absence of the notice of cancellation with content required by s 129 – whether s 474 applied so as to protect the decision to refuse to revoke the cancellation from judicial review. Constitution, ss 71, 75(iii), 75(v) Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), s 39B, s 44 Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) ss 15, 15A, 15AA Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) ss 3, 8 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 23 Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 3A, 36, 65, 116, 128, 129, 131, 424A, 474, 475, 475A, 476 Migration Legislation Amendment (Judicial Review) Act 2001 (Cth) Migration Legislation Amendment (Procedural Fairness) Act 2002 (Cth) R v Hickman; Ex parte Fox and Clinton (1945) 70 CLR 598, followed R v Drake-Brockman; Ex parte Northern Colliery Proprietors' Association [1946] ALR 106, followed R v The Commonwealth Rent Controller; Ex parte National Mutual Life Association of Australasia Ltd (1947) 75 CLR 361, followed R v Central Reference Board; Ex parte Thiess (Repairs) Pty Ltd (1948) 77 CLR 123, followed R v Murray; Ex parte Proctor (1949) 77 CLR 387, followed R v The Commonwealth Court of Conciliation & Arbitration; Ex parte Grant (1950) 81 CLR 27, followed R v Metal Trades Employers' Association; Ex parte Amalgamated Engineering Union, Australian Section (1951) 82 CLR 208, followed R v Kelly; Ex parte Berman (1953) 89 CLR 608, followed R v The Members of the Central Sugar Cane Prices Board; Ex parte The Maryborough Sugar Factory Ltd (1959) 101 CLR 246, followed The Coal Miners' Industrial Union of Workers of Western Australia v Amalgamated Collieries of Western Australia Ltd (1960) 104 CLR 437, followed R v The Commonwealth Conciliation & Arbitration Commission; Ex parte The Amalgamated Engineering Union (Australian Section) (1968) 118 CLR 219, followed R v Judges of the Commonwealth Industrial Court; Ex parte Cocks [1969] ALR 161, cited R v Coldham; Ex parte The Australian Workers' Union (1983) 153 CLR 415, followed O'Toole v Charles David Pty Ltd (1991) 171 CLR 232, followed Construction, Forestry, Mining & Energy Union v Australian Industrial Relations Commission (1999) 93 FCR 317, cited Re Alcan Australia Ltd; Ex parte Federation of Industrial, Manufacturing & Engineering Employees (1994) 181 CLR 96, applied Darling Casino Ltd v New South Wales Casino Control Authority (1997) 191 CLR 602, considered Deputy Commissioner of Taxation of the Commonwealth of Australia v Richard Walter Pty Ltd (1995) 183 CLR 168, considered Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Eshetu (1999) 197 CLR 611, applied Corporation of the City of Enfield v City Development Assessment Commission (2000) 199 CLR 135, applied R v Connell; Ex parte Hetton Bellbird Collieries Ltd (1944) 69 CLR 407, applied Craig v South Australia (1995) 184 CLR 163, distinguished Abebe v The Commonwealth (1999) 197 CLR 170, considered Attorney General (Commonwealth) v Breckler (1999) 197 CLR 83, followed SZ v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs (2000) 101 FCR 342, followed Kioa v West (1985) 159 CLR 550, considered Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Miah (2001) 179 ALR 238, considered The Colonial Bank of Australasia v Willan (1874) LR 5 PC 417, followed Baxter v New South Wales Clickers' Association (1909) 10 CLR 114, followed Wall v The King; Ex parte King Won and Mah On (No 1) (1927) 39 CLR 245, cited The Australian Coal & Shale Employees Federation v Aberfield Coal Mining Co Ltd (1942) 66 CLR 161, cited Houssein v The Under Secretary, Department of Industrial Relations & Technology (NSW) (1981-2) 148 CLR 88, cited Hoare Bros Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (1996) 62 FCR 302, cited Sunrise Auto Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (1995) 61 FCR 446, cited Darrell Lea Chocolate Shops Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (1996) 72 FCR 175, cited San Remo Macaroni Company Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation 1999 ATC 5138, cited Briglia v Federal Commissioner of Taxation 2000 ATC 4247, cited Kordan Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation 2000 ATC 4812, cited Diahatsu Australia Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (2001) 184 ALR 576, cited Meredith v Commissioner of Taxation of the Commonwealth of Australia 2001 ATC 4595, cited Comalco Aluminium (Bell Bay) Ltd v O'Connor (1995) 131 ALR 657, cited NAAG of 2002 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 713, approved Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf (2001) 180 ALR 1, distinguished Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259, followed Re Bolton; Ex parte Beane (1987) 162 CLR 514, considered Avon Downs Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1949) 78 CLR 353, cited Chu Kheng Lim v Minister for Immigration, Local Government & Ethnic Affairs (1992) 176 CLR 1, distinguished Re Refugee Review Tribunal; Ex parte Aala (2000) 204 CLR 82, distinguished Boakye-Danquah v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 438, not approved Corporate Affairs Commission (NSW) v Yuill (1991) 172 CLR 319, considered Mills v Meeking (1990) 169 CLR 214, considered Black-Clawson International Ltd v Papierwerke Waldhof-Aschaffenburg AG [1975] AC 591, cited Cooper Brookes (Wollongong) Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1981) 147 CLR 297, considered CIC Insurance Ltd v Bankstown Football Club Ltd (1995) 187 CLR 384, considered R v L (1994) 49 FCR 534, considered Gardner Smith Pty Ltd v Collector of Customs (Vic) (1986) 66 ALR 377, considered Barry R Liggins Pty Ltd v Comptroller-General of Customs (1991) 32 FCR 112, considered Catlow v Accident Compensation Commission (1989) 167 CLR 543, considered Jumbunna Coal Mine NL v Victorian Coal Miners' Association (1908) 6 CLR 309, considered Minister for Foreign Affairs & Trade v Magno (1992) 37 FCR 298, considered Queensland v The Commonwealth (1989) 167 CLR 232, considered Koowarta v Bjelke-Petersen (1982) 153 CLR 168, considered Yager v The Queen (1977) 139 CLR 28, considered Theophanous v The Herald & Weekly Times Ltd (1994) 182 CLR 104, considered Australian Communist Party v The Commonwealth (1951) 83 CLR 1, considered R v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Ex parte Pierson [1998] AC 539, cited Potter v Minahan (1908) 7 CLR 277, considered Bropho v State of Western Australia (1990) 171 CLR 1, considered Coco v The Queen (1994) 179 CLR 427, considered Shergold v Tanner (2002) 188 ALR 302, followed R v Lord Chancellor; Ex parte Witham [1998] QB 575, referred to R v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Ex parte Simms [2002] 2 AC 115, cited Water Conservation and Irrigation Commissioner (NSW) v Browning (1947) 74 CLR 492, cited R v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal; Ex parte 2HD Pty Ltd (1979) 144 CLR 45, cited FAI Insurances Ltd v Winneke (1982) 151 CLR 342, cited Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko- Wallsend Ltd (1986) 162 CLR 24, considered O'Sullivan v Farrer (1989) 168 CLR 210, cited Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72, cited WA Pines Pty Ltd v Bannerman (1980) 30 ALR 559, referred to Nakkuda Ali v Jayaratne [1951] AC 66, referred to Bradley v The Commonwealth (1973) 128 CLR 557, referred to Goldie v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs (2002) 188 ALR 708, referred to Buck v Bavone (1976) 135 CLR 110, cited Coal & Allied Operations Pty Ltd v Australian Industrial Relations Commission (2000) 203 CLR 194, cited Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Jia (2001) 178 ALR 421, cited Re Patterson; Ex parte Taylor (2001) 182 ALR 657, cited Anisminic Ltd v Foreign Compensation Commission [1969] 2 AC 147, distinguished Anisminic Ltd v Foreign Compensation Commission [1968] 2 QB 862, cited R v Electricity Commissioners; Ex parte London Electricity Joint Committee Co (1920) Limited [1924] 1 KB 171, cited R v Commissioner of Patents; Ex parte Weiss (1939) 61 CLR 240, cited Ridge v Baldwin [1964] AC 40, cited R v Toohey; Ex parte Northern Land Council (1981) 151 CLR 170, cited Re Racal Communications Ltd [1981] AC 374, cited O'Reilly v Mackman [1982] 2 AC 237, cited Cabal v Attorney-General (Cth) (2001) 188 ALR 77, considered Timbarri Protection Coalition Inc v Ross Mining NL (1999) 46 NSWLR 55, considered Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355, followed Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Bhardwaj (2002) 187 ALR 117, considered Twist v Randwick Municipal Council (1976) 136 CLR 106, cited Salemi v Mackellar (No 2) (1977) 137 CLR 396, cited Heatley v Tasmanian Racing and Gaming Commission (1977) 137 CLR 487, cited Haoucher v Minister of State for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs (1990) 169 CLR 648, cited Annetts v McCann (1990) 170 CLR 596, cited Muin v Refugee Review Tribunal [2002] HCA 30, cited Vanmeld Pty Ltd v Fairfield City Council (1999) 46 NSWLR 78, cited Country Roads National Companies & Securities Commission v News Corporation Ltd (1984) 156 CLR 296, cited Mobil Oil Australia Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (1963) 113 CLR 475, cited Barratt v Howard (2000) FCR 428, cited R v Liverpool Corporation; Ex parte Liverpool Taxi Fleet Operators Association [1972] 2 QB 299, cited Attorney-General (Hong Kong) v Ng Yuen Shiu [1983] 2 AC 629, cited Attorney-General (NSW) v Quin (1990) 170 CLR 1, cited Public Service Association (SA) v Federated Clerks Union (1991) 173 CLR 132, considered Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs v Teoh (1995) 183 CLR 273, considered Kwan v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 498, not approved SBBK v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 265, not approved
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate