Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WAFA of 2002 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural
& Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCAFC 248
MIGRATION – no error disclosed – appeal dismissed Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 424A(3) Migration Legislation Amendment (Judicial Review) Act (Cth) 2001 WAFA OF 2002 -v- MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS W59 OF 2002 MARSHALL, WEINBERG AND JACOBSON JJ 20 AUGUST 2002 PERTH
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY W59 OF 2002
ON APPEAL FROM A SINGLE JUDGE
OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: WAFA OF 2002
APPELLANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGES: MARSHALL, WEINBERG and JACOBSON JJ
DATE OF ORDER: 20 AUGUST 2002
WHERE MADE: PERTH
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The appeal be dismissed. 2. The appellant pay the respondent's costs of the appeal. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY W59 OF 2002
ON APPEAL FROM A SINGLE JUDGE
OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: WAFA OF 2002
APPELLANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGES: MARSHALL, WEINBERG and JACOBSON JJ
DATE: 20 AUGUST 2002
PLACE: PERTH
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
THE COURT 1 This is an appeal from a judgment of R D Nicholson J in which his Honour dismissed the appellant's application to review a decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal ("the RRT"). The RRT decided that the appellant was not entitled to a protection visa by reference to the Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees 1951 as amended by the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees 1967 ("the Convention"). 2 The application before R D Nicholson J was filed in June 2001. It was dealt with in accordance with the provisions of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ("the Act") which applied prior to amendments to the Act which took effect on 2 October 2001; see Migration Legislation Amendment (Judicial Review) Act (Cth) 2001 ("the 2001 Act"). It follows that this appeal does not raise for consideration the effect of the "privative clause" provisions inserted by the 2001 Act.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate