Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WAFX of 2002 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCAFC 263
MIGRATION – no error disclosed – appeal dismissed.
Migration Act 1958 (Cth)
Migration Legislation Amendment (Judicial Review) Act 2001 (Cth) WAFX OF 2002 v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION, MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS W 100 OF 2002 MARSHALL, WEINBERG AND JACOBSON JJ PERTH 22 AUGUST 2002
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY W 100 OF 2002
ON APPEAL FROM A SINGLE JUDGE
OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: WAFX OF 2002
APPELLANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION, MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGES: MARSHALL, WEINBERG AND JACOBSON JJ
DATE OF ORDER: 22 AUGUST 2002
WHERE MADE: PERTH
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The appeal be dismissed. 2. The appellant pay the respondent's costs of the appeal. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY W 100 OF 2002
ON APPEAL FROM A SINGLE JUDGE
OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: APPELLANT WAFX OF 2002
APPELLANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION, MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGES: MARSHALL, WEINBERG AND JACOBSON JJ
DATE: 22 AUGUST 2002
PLACE: PERTH
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
THE COURT 1 This is an appeal from a judgment of a judge of the Court, R D Nicholson J, dismissing an application by the appellant for judicial review of a decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal ("the RRT"). On 28 June 2001 the RRT affirmed a decision of a delegate of the respondent not to grant a protection visa to the appellant. 2 The application before R D Nicholson J was filed on 29 June 2001. It was dealt with in accordance with the provisions of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ("the Act") which applied prior to amendments to the Act which took effect on 2 October 2001; see Migration Legislation Amendment (Judicial Review) Act 2001 (Cth) ("the 2001 Act"). This appeal consequently does not raise for consideration the effect of the "privative clause" provisions inserted into the Act by the 2001 Act.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate