Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Kenman Kandy Australia Pty Ltd v
Registrar of Trade Marks [2002] FCAFC 273
TRADE MARKS – shape marks – three-dimensional shape of pieces of confectionery – shape of an imaginary bug – whether inherently adapted to distinguish manufacturer's confectionery from the confectionery of others – no reliance on capacity to distinguish derived from use – reliance on inherent adaptation to distinguish alone – meaning of "inherently adapted to distinguish" – whether necessary for a trade mark to be separate from the goods in relation to which it is to be used – whether "goods" includes their shapes as an essential element of them
Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) s 6 ("sign", "trade mark", "use of a trade mark"), s 7(4), s 17, s 41
DR Shanahan, Australian Law of Trade Mark and Passing Off, 2nd Edition, LBC (1990) Re Application by Chocolaterie Guylian NV (1999) 46 IPR 201 cited Kenman Kandy Australia Pty Ltd v Registrar of Trade Marks (2001) 52 IPR 137 cited Jafferjee v Scarlett (1937) 57 CLR 115 cited Eclipse Sleep Products Inc v Registrar of Trade Marks (1957) 99 CLR 300 cited Rountree PLC v Rollbits Pty Ltd (1988) 90 FLR 398 cited Registrar of Trade Marks v Woolworths Ltd (1999) 93 FCR 365 applied Genetics Institute Inc v Kirin-Amgen Inc (1999) 92 FCR 106 cited Renaud Cointreau & Cie v Cordon Bleu International Ltee (2001) 52 IPR 382 cited Genetics Institute Inc v Kirin-Amgen Inc (1999) 43 IPR 189 cited Attorney-General (NSW) v Brewery Employees' Union of NSW (1908) 6 CLR 469 cited Davis v The Commonwealth (1988) 166 CLR 79 cited Nintendo Co Ltd v Centronics System Pty Ltd (1994) 181 CLR 134 cited Grain Pool of Western Australia v The Commonwealth (2001) 202 CLR 479 cited Advanced Hair Studio of America Pty Ltd v Registrar of Trade Marks (1988) 10 IPR 583 cited Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV v Remington Products Australia Pty Ltd (1999) 91 FCR 167 cited Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV v Remington Products Australia Pty Ltd (2000) 100 FCR 90 distinguished Thomson v B Seppelt & Sons Ltd (1925) 37 CLR 305 cited Burger King Corporation v Registrar of Trade Marks (1973) 128 CLR 417 cited Clark Equipment Co v Registrar of Trade Marks (1964) 111 CLR 511 cited Registrar of Trade Marks v W & G Du Cros Ltd [1913] AC 624 cited FH Faulding & Co Ltd v Imperial Chemical Industries of Australia and New Zealand Ltd (1965) 112 CLR 537 cited Eutectic Corporation v Registrar of Trade Marks (1980) 1A IPR 550 cited TGI Friday's Australia Pty Ltd v TGI Friday's Inc (2000) 100 FCR 358 cited British Sugar Plc v James Robertson & Sons Ltd [1996] RPC 281 cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate