Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NACR of 2002 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCAFC 318 MIGRATION – refugee – practitioner of Falun Gong – imputed political opinion -– whether appellant could evade risk by practising in private – whether persecution based on denial of access to employment - whether primary Judge erred in holding that decision of Refugee Review Tribunal refusing a protection visa had not involved an error of law
Migration Act 1958 (Cth)
Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs v Guo (1997) 191 CLR 559 cited Abebe v Commonwealth (1999) 197 CLR 510 cited N989/01 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCAFC 237 followed Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Rajalingam (1999) 93 FCR 220 cited Chan Yee Kin v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1989) 169 CLR 379 followed Gao v Attorney General of the United States (2002) 299 F.3d 266 cited Wang v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2000) 179 ALR 1 cited Farajvand v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 795 cited Win v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 132 cited A v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2002] EWCA Civ 1171 cited N989/01A v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 434 cited W375/01A v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 379 cited WAIZ v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 1375 cited Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 cited Craig v South Australia (1995) 184 CLR 163 applied Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf (2001) 180 ALR applied Chan v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1989) 169 CLR 379 cited He v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2002] EWCA Civ 1150 cited NACR of 2002 v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS N 131 OF 2002 BEAUMONT, LEE & KIEFEL JJ 15 NOVEMBER 2002 SYDNEY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate