Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Chapman v Luminis Pty Ltd [2002] FCAFC 343
THOMAS LINCOLN CHAPMAN, WENDY JENNIFER CHAPMAN AND BINALONG PTY LIMITED (RECEIVERS AND MANAGERS APPOINTED) (IN LIQUIDATION) V LUMINIS PTY LIMITED, DEANE JOANNE FERGIE, CHERYL ANNE SAUNDERS AND ROBERT EDWARD TICKNER
NO S 152 OF 2001
BEAUMONT, SUNDBERG & HELY JJ
12 NOVEMBER 2002
SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY S 152 OF 2001
ON APPEAL FROM A SINGLE JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: THOMAS LINCOLN CHAPMAN
FIRST APPELLANT
WENDY JENNIFER CHAPMAN
SECOND APPELLANT
BINALONG PTY LIMITED (RECEIVERS AND MANAGERS APPOINTED) (IN LIQUIDATION)
THIRD APPELLANT
AND: LUMINIS PTY LIMITED
FIRST RESPONDENT
DEANE JOANNE FERGIE
SECOND RESPONDENT
CHERYL ANNE SAUNDERS
THIRD RESPONDENT
ROBERT EDWARD TICKNER
FOURTH RESPONDENT
JUDGE: BEAUMONT, SUNDBERG & HELY JJ
DATE OF ORDER: 12 NOVEMBER 2002
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT DIRECTS THAT: The application be stood over, reserving liberty to restore the application at the conclusion of argument on the other aspects of the appeal.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY S 152 OF 2001
ON APPEAL FROM A SINGLE JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: THOMAS LINCOLN CHAPMAN
FIRST APPELLANT
WENDY JENNIFER CHAPMAN
SECOND APPELLANT
BINALONG PTY LIMITED (RECEIVERS AND MANAGERS APPOINTED) (IN LIQUIDATION)
THIRD APPELLANT
AND: LUMINIS PTY LIMITED
FIRST RESPONDENT
DEANE JOANNE FERGIE
SECOND RESPONDENT
CHERYL ANNE SAUNDERS
THIRD RESPONDENT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate