Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Cosma v Qantas Airways Ltd [2002] FCAFC 425 DISCRIMINATION LAW – whether appellant unlawfully discriminated against on the grounds of disability – where injured in 1991 while working as a porter in Ramp Services – where subsequently undertook rehabilitation and other duties – whether "particular employment" was as a porter in Ramp Services – whether "inherent requirements" of employment were that of a person employed as a porter in Ramp Services – where appellant could not resume duties as a porter in Ramp Services – whether respondent unlawfully discriminated in terminating employment in 1997 when appellant could not be redeployed in company Words and Phrases – "particular employment" Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) ss 11, 15 Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 (Cth) s 40 Waters v Public Transport Corporation (1991) 173 CLR 349 referred to I W v City of Perth (1997) 191 CLR 1 referred to Qantas Airways Limited v Christie (1997-1998) 193 CLR 280 referred to X v The Commonwealth (1999) 200 CLR 177 followed SILVANO COSMA v QANTAS AIRWAYS LIMITED (ACN 009 661 901) V 348 OF 2002 BLACK CJ, FINN & DOWSETT JJ 20 DECEMBER 2002 MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V 348 OF 2002
ON APPEAL FROM A JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: SILVANO COSMA
APPELLANT
AND: QANTAS AIRWAYS LIMITED (ACN 009 661 901)
RESPONDENT
JUDGES: BLACK CJ, FINN & DOWSETT JJ
DATE OF ORDER: 20 DECEMBER 2002
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The appeal be dismissed with costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V 348 OF 2002
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate