Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Kebaro Pty Ltd v Saunders [2003] FCAFC 5
COSTS – appeal to Full Court from non-party costs order awarded in favour of successful respondents – where applicants at trial people of straw – whether primary Judge erred in finding that interests of justice required non-party costs order – whether primary Judge erred in finding that non-party had a relevant interest in the litigation – whether primary Judge erred in finding that non-party played an active part in the litigation – whether primary Judge should have found that failure of respondents to give notice to non-party disentitled them to costs order – no basis for appellate intervention.
Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 43, 56 Real Property Act 1886 (SA) s 136
Aiden Shipping Co Ltd v Interbulk Ltd [1986] 1 AC 965 applied Bischof v Adams [1992] 2 VR 198 considered Arundel Chiropractic Centre Pty Ltd v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (2001) 179 ALR 406 followed Carborundum Abrasives Ltd v Bank of New Zealand (No. 2) [1992] 3 NZLR 757 considered Chapman v Luminis Pty Ltd (1998) 86 FCR 513 cited Chapman v Luminis Pty Limited (No. 5) [2001] FCA 1106 referred to Chapman v Luminis Pty Limited (No. 7) [2002] FCA 1098 affirmed Condliffe v Hightop [1996] 1 WLR 753 considered Flinn v Flinn [1999] 3 VR 712 considered Gore (t/as Clayton Utz) v Justice Corporation Pty Ltd (2002) 189 ALR 712 followed Individual Homes v Macbreams Investments, 23 October 2002, High Court of Justice Chancery Division cited Knight v FP Special Assets Ltd (1992) 174 CLR 178 followed McFarlane v E E Caledonia Ltd (No. 2) [1995] 1 WLR 366 considered Murphy v Young & Co's Brewery [1997] 1 WLR 1591 considered Oasis Hotel Ltd. v. Zurich Insurance Co. (1981) 124 DLR (3d) 455 referred to Re Sturmer and Town of Beaverton (1912) 2 DLR 501 referred to Shah v Karanjia [1993] 2 All ER 792 considered Symphony Group Plc v Hodgson [1994] QB 179 distinguished Taylor v Pace Developments Ltd [1991] ECC 406 cited TGA Chapman Ltd v Christopher [1998] 1 WLR 12 considered Symphony Group Plc v Hodgson [1994] QB 179 considered Vestris v Cashman (1998) 72 SASR 449 distinguished Yates v Boland [2000] FCA 1895 applied
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate