Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Construction, Forestry, Mining & Energy Union v BHP Steel (AIS) Pty Ltd [2003] FCAFC 13 CONTEMPT OF COURT - appellant found guilty of contempt of court - penalty reduced following appeal to Full Court - appeal from judgment on assessment of penalty - factors not taken into account by primary judge - partial compliance with court order - conduct of officials at union meeting - rationale for exercise of contempt power - nature of contempt by respondent - delay in giving effect to court order - impediment to proper administration of justice - contempt by representative body - whether primary judge erred in assessment of penalty - whether appellant's compliance in Queensland should have been taken into account - whether conduct of union officials should have been considered when assessing penalty COSTS - indemnity costs awarded against appellant by primary judge - costs order not taken into account by primary judge when fixing penalty imposed - discretion to award indemnity costs in contempt proceedings - public nature of appellant's contempt - whether primary judge erred in not considering indemnity costs awarded when assessing penalty imposed
Colgate-Palmolive Company v Cussons Pty Ltd (1993) 46 FCR 225 cited Australian Transport Insurance Pty Ltd v Graeme Phillips Road Transport Insurance Pty Ltd (1986) 10 FCR 177 cited Tetijo Holdings Pty Ltd v Keeprite Australia Pty Ltd (unreported, Federal Court, 3 May 1991) cited Re Wilcox; Ex parte Venture Industries Pty Ltd (2) (1996) 72 FCR 151 cited McIntyre v Perkes (1988) 15 NSWLR 417 referred to Adlam v Noack [1999] FCA 1606 referred to LED Builders Pty Ltd v Eagle Homes Pty Ltd [1999] FCA 1213 cited Perkes v Landon (1988) 15 NSWLR 408 cited Plating Company v Farquharson (1881) 17 Ch 49 referred to Stancomb v Trowbridge Urban District Council [1910] 2 Ch 190 cited Attorney-General; ex rel Leyton (Essex) Urban District Council v Walthamstow Urban District Council (1895) 11 TLR 533 cited Rex v Ogilvie (1928) 23 Tas LR 69 at 76 referred to GCT Management Ltd v The Laurie Marsh Group Ltd [1973] 14 RPC 432 referred to Michigan v Mathew [1966] 3 RPC 47 cited Marron v Salvemini; Re Scardigno [1969] WAR 178 cited Sunibrite Products (Aust) Pty Ltd v Jabuna Pty Ltd (1980) 47 FLR 73 referred to Brambles Holdings Ltd v Trade Practices Commission (1980) 32 ALR 328 referred to Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Australian Business Reports Pty Ltd (1997) 19 ATPR 41-577 referred to Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v BHP Steel (AIS) Pty Limited [2002] FCA 1758 discussed Australasian Meat Industry Employees Union v Mudginberri Station Pty Limited (1986) 161 CLR 98 followed Witham v Holloway (1995) 183 CLR 525 referred to House v the King (1936) 55 CLR 499 referred to Shott AG Australian Supplement to Borrie & Lowe's Law of Contempt, (2nd ed) Lowe & Sufrin Borrie & Lowe's Law of Contempt, 3rd ed., 1996 CONSTRUCTION, FORESTRY, MINING AND ENERGY UNION v BHP STEEL (AIS) PTY LTD ACN 000 019 625 Q 100 OF 2002 MOORE, TAMBERLIN AND GOLDBERG JJ SYDNEY 21 FEBRUARY 2003
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate