Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Commissioner of Taxation v Mochkin [2002] FCAFC 15 INCOME TAX – Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth), Part IVA – company established to carry on a sharebroking business previously conducted by taxpayer – identification of scheme – whether taxpayer entered the scheme for the dominant purpose of obtaining a tax benefit – fact that scheme has tax advantages not inconsistent with finding that the taxpayer's dominant purpose was not to obtain a tax benefit. Taxpayer causes "finder's fee" to be paid to company he controls – fee generated by taxpayer's own efforts – finding that the taxpayer entered a scheme for the dominant purpose of obtaining a tax benefit – whether finding should be upheld. INCOME TAX – whether officer had authority to make determination pursuant to Part IVA of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) – whether decision-maker failed to realise that he had a discretion not to make a determination. INCOME TAX – Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth), s 25 – whether income paid to corporation "derived" by taxpayer conducting the business of the corporation.
Income Tax Assessment Act 1936, ss 25(1), 177A, 177C, 177F Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth), s 8(1) Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Spotless Services Ltd (1996) 186 CLR 404, cited. Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Peabody (1994) 181 CLR 359, cited. Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Consolidated Press Holdings Ltd (No 1)(1999) 91 FCR 524, cited. Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Consolidated Press Holdings Ltd (2001) 207 CLR 235, cited. Hart v Commissioner of Taxation [2002] ATC 4608, cited. Eastern Nitrogen Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (2001) 108 FCR 27, cited. Vincent v Commissioner of Taxation (2002) 193 ALR 686, cited. Peate v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1964) 111 CLR 443, cited. Tupicoff v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1984) 4 FCR 505, cited. Bunting v Commissioner of Taxation (1989) 24 FCR 283, cited. Case W58 (1989) 89 ATC 524, distinguished. Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Squatting Investment Co Ltd (1954) 88 CLR 413, cited. Scott v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1966) 117 CLR 514, cited. O'Reilly v The Commissioners of the State Bank of Victoria (1983) 153 CLR 1, cited. Garnac Grain Co Inc v HMF Faure & Fairclough Ltd [1968] AC 1130, cited. Re Reference Under Section 11 of Ombudsman Act 1976 for an Advisory Opinion; Ex parte Director-General of Social Services (1979) 2 ALD 86, cited. Avon Downs Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1949) 78 CLR 353, cited. Citibank Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1988) 83 ALR 144, cited. Permanent Trustee Co of New South Wales v Commissioner of Taxation (1940) 6 ATD 5, cited. Brent v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1971) 125 CLR 418, cited. Hadlee & Sydney Bridge Nominees Ltd v Commissioner of Inland Revenue (NZ) [1993] AC 524, not followed. Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Everett (1980) 143 CLR 440, cited. Liedig v Commissioner of Taxation (1994) 50 FCR 461, cited. COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION v MOCHKIN V 389 of 2002 SACKVILLE, MERKEL & KENNY JJ MELBOURNE 21 FEBRUARY 2003
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate