Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA Heap, in the matter of an Application for Writs of Prohibition, Certiorari and Mandamus against the Australian Industrial Relations Commission [2003] FCAFC 36
INDUSTRIAL LAW – workplace relations – termination of employment – arbitration by member of Australian Industrial Relations Commission – member requested private conference with representatives of one party late in proceeding – made comments on problems in that party's case and suggested implications beyond individual case – comment in strong terms – whether apprehended bias – member refused to disqualify herself – Full Bench allowed appeal – whether error by Full Bench – whether conciliation by member conducting arbitration proper – whether consenting to participate in private conference amounted to waiver of right to object to what was said – whether possibility of jurisdictional error
NATURAL JUSTICE – bias – whether reasonable apprehension – member of Australian Industrial Relations Commission suggested private conference with one party at late stage of arbitration of application related to termination of employment – whether disqualified by comments made in strong terms about party's case – relevance of particular practice of tribunal – relevance of opinion of Full Bench about propriety of member's conduct
Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) ss 45, 170CE, 170CF, 170CG Johnson v Johnson [2000] HCA 48 (2000) 201 CLR 488 at [11] – cited
Livesey v New South Wales Bar Association (1983) 151 CLR 288 at 299 – 300 – cited Re JRL; Ex parte CJL (1986) 161 CLR 342 at 352 – cited Helljay Investments Pty Ltd v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [1999] HCA 56 at [12] – cited Vakauta v Kelly (1989) 167 CLR 568 at 571 – cited Laws v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal (1990) 170 CLR 70 at 100 – cited Kaycliff Pty Ltd v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal (1989) 90 ALR 310 at 317 – cited Re Lusink; Ex parte Shaw (1980) 55 ALJR 12 at 15 – cited Richmond River Broadcasters Pty Ltd v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal (1992) 34 FCR 385 at 395 – cited Barton v Walker [1979] 2 NSWLR 740 at 751 – cited Brooks v The Upjohn Co (1998) 85 FCR 469 at 472 – 477 – cited Algama v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 476 (2001) 194 ALR 638 at [113] – [116] – cited Re McJannet; Ex parte Australian Workers' Union of Employees, Queensland [No 2] (1997) 189 CLR 654 at 656 – 657 – referred to
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate