Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs v Al Masri [2003] FCAFC 70
MIGRATION – mandatory detention of an unlawful non-citizen pending removal from Australia – whether continued detention authorised where no real likelihood or prospect of removal in the reasonably foreseeable future INTERPRETATION OF STATUTES – presumption against curtailment of fundamental rights or freedoms – common law right to personal liberty – implied limitation on statutory power of detention CONSTITUTIONAL LAW – power of the Commonwealth Parliament to legislate with respect to aliens – power of Executive to detain alien in custody – judicial power of Commonwealth – principle of statutory interpretation that Parliament does not intend to exceed limits of Constitution INTERNATIONAL TREATIES – International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights – interpretation of statute consistently with established rules of international law and in accordance with Australia's treaty obligations PRACTICE & PROCEDURE – competency of appeal – where applicant removed from Australia prior to determination of appeal – where outstanding controversy as to costs
Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 189, 196, 198, 200, 206, 253, 486C Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) s 15A Constitution s 51(xix), s 51(xxxix), Ch III Al Masri v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (2002) 192 ALR 609 considered Chu Kheng Lim v Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs (1992) 176 CLR 1 applied NAMU of 2002 v Secretary, Department of Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 907 referred to Vo v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs (2000) 98 FCR 371 distinguished R v Governor of Durham Prison; Ex parte Hardial Singh [1984] 1 WLR 704 considered Tan Te Lam v Superintendent of Tai A Chau Detention Centre [1997] AC 97 considered Zadvydas v Davis 533 US 678 (2001) considered Al Masri v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 1037 referred to Al Masri v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 1099 referred to NAMU of 2002 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCAFC 401 followed Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs v VFAD of 2002 (2003) 196 ALR 111followed Koon Wing Lau v Calwell (1949) 80 CLR 533 applied Kruger v The Commonwealth (1997) 190 CLR 1 considered Cunliffe v The Commonwealth (1994) 182 CLR 272 considered Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth of Australia (2003) 195 ALR 24 applied Coco v The Queen (1994) 179 CLR 427 applied Daniels Corporation International Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2002) 192 ALR 561 applied Williams v The Queen (1986) 161 CLR 278 considered Leachinsky v Christie [1946] 1 KB 124 referred to Murray v Minister of Defence [1988]1 WLR 692 referred to Re Bolton; Ex parte Beane (1987) 162 CLR 514 referred to Watson v Marshall and Cade (1971) 124 CLR 621 referred to Kioa v West (1985) 159 CLR 550 followed R v Home Secretary; Ex parte Khawaja [1984] AC 74 considered Coalition of Clergy, Lawyers & Law Professors v Bush 310 F.3d 1153 (2002) referred to R v Secretary of State for the Home Department; ex parte Saadi [2002] 4 All ER 785 considered Thang Thieu Quyen v Director of Immigration (1997-98) 1 HKCFAR 167 considered Park Oh Ho v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1989) 167 CLR 637 applied van Alphen v The Netherlands (UNHRC Communication No. 305/88) considered A v Australia (UNHRC Communication No. 560/93) considered Johnson v Johnson (2000) 201 CLR at 501 considered Commonwealth v Hamilton (2000) 108 FCR 378 considered Chahal v The United Kingdom (1996) 23 EHRR 413 considered Perez v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs (2002) 191 ALR 619 considered Luu v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCAFC 369 distinguished WAIS v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 1625 considered NAKG of 2002 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 1600 considered Daniel v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (2003) 196 ALR 52 considered NAGA v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 224 considered Al Khafaji v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 1369 considered Applicant WAIW of 2002 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 1621 considered NAES v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 2 considered SHFB v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 29 considered SHFB v Goodwin [2003] FCA 294 considered SHDB v Goodwin [2003] FCA 300 considered F.R Bennion, Statutory Interpretation (4th ed 2002) Lord Steyn "The Intractable Problem of The Interpretation of Legal Texts" (2003) 25 Syd Law Review 4 Professor M. Nowak, The UN Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: CCPR Commentary (N.P. Engel, 1993) MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS v AKRAM OUDA MOHAMMAD AL MASRI S202 of 2002 BLACK CJ, SUNDBERG AND WEINBERG JJ 15 APRIL 2003 MELBOURNE (HEARD IN SYDNEY)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate