Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NANM and NANN of 2002 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 99 Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 36(2) Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth of Australia (2003) 195 ALR 24, considered Muin v Refugee Review Tribunal (2002) 190 ALR 601, referred to NANMandNANNof 2002 v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS N 1214 of 2002 WHITLAM, FINN & GOLDBERG JJ 20 MAY 2003 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 1214 of 2002
ON APPEAL FROM A SINGLE JUDGE OF THE
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: NANM and NANN of 2002
Appellants
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
Respondent
JUDGE: WHITLAM, FINN & GOLDBERG JJ
DATE OF ORDER: 20 MAY 2003
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The appeal be dismissed. 2. The appellants pay the respondent's costs of and incidental to the appeal. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 1214 of 2002
ON APPEAL FROM A SINGLE JUDGE OF THE
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: NANM and NANN of 2002
Appellants
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
Respondent
JUDGE: WHITLAM, FINN & GOLDBERG JJ
DATE: 20 MAY 2003
PLACE: SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 The appellants, a husband and wife from Bangladesh, applied for protection visas, which were refused by a delegate of the respondent ("the Minister") on 12 August 1999. On 9 September 1999 the appellants sought review of the delegate's decision before the Refugee Review Tribunal ("the Tribunal") and on 20 May 2002 the Tribunal affirmed the decision of the delegate not to grant the appellants protection visas. The appellants then filed an application for review before a single judge of the Court. The application was dismissed on 30 October 2002. The appellants now appeal against that decision.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate