Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SDAE v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 111
MIGRATION – refugee application by Iranian national – Refugee Review Tribunal – whether failure to consider all 'integers' of claim – whether failure to consider elements of claim cumulatively Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf (2001) 206 CLR 323 referred to Htun v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2001) 194 ALR 244 referred to Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Rajalingam (1999) 93 FCR 220 referred to
SDAE v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
S 9 of 2003
WEINBERG, STONE & JACOBSON JJ
28 MAY 2003
SYDNEY (HEARD IN ADELAIDE)
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY S 9 OF 2003
ON APPEAL FROM A SINGLE JUDGE OF THE
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: SDAE
APPELLANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGES: WEINBERG, STONE & JACOBSON JJ
DATE OF ORDER: 28 MAY 2003
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY (HEARD IN ADELAIDE)
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The appeal be dismissed. 2. The appellant pay the respondent's costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY S 9 OF 2003
ON APPEAL FROM A SINGLE JUDGE OF THE
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: SDAE
APPELLANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGES: WEINBERG, STONE & JACOBSON JJ
DATE: 28 MAY 2003
PLACE: SYDNEY (HEARD IN ADELAIDE)
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
THE COURT 1 This is an appeal from a judgment of Mansfield J (SDAE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 1583) dismissing an application for review of a decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal ("the Tribunal"). By that decision, the Tribunal affirmed a refusal by a delegate of the then Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs ("the Minister") to grant the appellant a protection visa.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate