Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SDAV v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs v SBBK [2003] FCAFC 129 MIGRATION – Migration Act 1958 (Cth) - jurisdictional error – privative clause - jurisdiction of Refugee Review Tribunal ('Tribunal') – failure of Tribunal to address a central element of the visa applicants' claims – visa applicants Iranian women subject to domestic violence – interpretation of phrase 'well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of membership of a particular social group' – discriminatory inactivity of State authorities Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 65(1), 474(1) Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), s 39B Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth), s 15A Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Khawar [2002] 187 ALR 574 cited NAAV v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (2002) 193 ALR 449 not followed The King v Hickman; Ex parte Fox and Clinton (1945) 70 CLR 598 cited Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth of Australia [2003] 195 ALR 24 followed R v Hickman; Ex parte Fox and Clinton (1945) 70 CLR 598 cited Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs; Ex parte Applicants S134/2002 (2003) 195 ALR 1 cited NAEB of 2002 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 25 cited Zahid v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 24 cited NALU of 2002 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 31 cited Applicant NAOB of 2002 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 33 cited SDAH v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 49 cited SCAT v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 80 cited SBBG v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 121 cited Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs v SCAR [2003] FCAFC 126 cited Lobo v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 144 disapproved Koulaxazov v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 75 not followed NACP v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 499 cited Craig v The State of South Australia (1995) 184 CLR 163 cited Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf (2001) 206 CLR 323 cited Dranichnikov v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2003] HCA 26 cited Khawar v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1999) 168 ALR 190 cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate