Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Dranichnikov v Centrelink [2003] FCAFC 133 ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – Judicial review of a decision of a single judge of the Federal Court of Australia – primary judge reviewing a decision made by the Secretary of Centrelink – whether the applicants were entitled to payment of a family tax benefit – whether the debt should be waived – whether the debt was attributably solely to an administrative error made by the Commonwealth – whether the decision maker failed to investigate the circumstances that lead to the overpayment – whether the decision maker failed to take relevant information into account in exercising their discretion not to waive the debt. SOCIAL SECURITY – family tax benefit. BIAS – whether the primary judge displayed actual bias – whether the primary judge should have disqualified himself. PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – whether the primary judge erred in striking out a paragraph of the application – whether the primary judge erred in refusing to amend the application.
Statutes A New Tax System (Family Assistance) Act 1999 (Cth) s 21 A New Tax System (Family Assistance) (Administration) Act 1999 (Cth) ss 89, 97, 101 Social Security Act 1991 (Cth) s 7
Cases Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321 Referred to Beadle v Directory-General of Social Security (1985) 60 ALR 225 Followed Commonwealth v Bradley (1999) 95 FCR 218 Referred to Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy (2000) 176 ALR 644 Referred to Jess v Scott (1986) 12 FCR 187 Followed Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Jia (1998) 84 FCR 87 Followed Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v Al Masri (2003) 197 ALR 241 Referred to Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth of Australia (2003) 195 ALR 24 Referred to Re Refugee Review Tribunal; Ex parte H (2001) 179 ALR 425 Followed Secretary of Department of Social Security v Hales (1998) 82 FCR 154 Followed Sun Zhan Qui v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1997) 81 FCR 71 Followed SERGEY DRANICHNIKOV and OLGA DRANICHNIKOV v CENTRELINK and BRIAN McKENNA Q 177 of 2002 HILL, KIEFEL & HELY JJ 19 JUNE 2003 BRISBANE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate