Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs v Awan [2003] FCAFC 140 MIGRATION – visa – student visa – Migration Review Tribunal relied on prior inconsistent statements of applicant to make negative finding on credit – whether obliged to provide particulars of information, and explanation of its relevance, to applicant – whether requirement to do so imperative duty on Tribunal or inviolable limitation on exercise of its power – whether jurisdictional error – criterion whether applicant a genuine applicant for entry and stay as a student, having regard to various matters – whether Tribunal erred by treating those matters as criteria – whether primary judge erred in exercise of discretion – whether discretion should be exercised against appellant Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 359A, 424A, 474 Migration Legislation Amendment (Procedural Fairness) Act 2002 (Cth) Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) item 560.224(1), Sch 2 Awan v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 594, cited Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Al Shamry [2001] FCA 919 (2001) 110 FCR 27, followed Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth of Australia [2003] HCA 2 (2003) 195 ALR 24, applied Qu v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1299, referred to Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf [2001] HCA 30 (2001) 206 CLR 323, referred to House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499, referred to Carlos v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2001) 183 ALR 719, considered Paul v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2001) 113 FCR 396, considered Singh v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1679, cited NAAV v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2002) 193 ALR 449, not followed Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs; Ex parte Applicants S134/2002 (2003) 195 ALR 1, considered Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Wang (2003) 196 ALR 385, cited Re Refugee Review Tribunal; Ex parte Aala (2000) 204 CLR 82, considered Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Miah (2001) 206 CLR 57, considered WAID v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 220, cited WAAJ v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCAFC 409, cited Annetts v McCann (1990) 170 CLR 596, cited Kanda v Government of the Federation of Malaya [1962] AC 322, cited Kioa v West (1985) 159 CLR 550, cited SBBG v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 121, cited VAAC v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 74, cited Stead v State Government Insurance Commission (1986) 161 CLR 141, cited Bax v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 55, cited MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS v IRFAN AHMED AWAN V 339 OF 2002 GRAY ACJ, MARSHALL AND MERKEL JJ 26 JUNE 2003 MELBOURNE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate