Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NAFG v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 152 MIGRATION – where Refugee Review Tribunal found applicant had right to reside in, enter and re-enter third country – whether decision involved jurisdictional error
MIGRATION – Refugees Convention – nature and existence of protection obligations – "safe third country" – right to re-enter – refoulement – whether Australia has "protection obligations" to applicant for refugee status who has "effective protection" in a third country
Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 36, 474 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees 1951, as amended by the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees 1967 art 33 Al-Rahal v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs (2001) 110 FCR 73 followed Anavaratham v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 903 applied Anavaratham v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCAFC 22 applied Craig v South Australia (1995) 184 CLR 163 cited Kola v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2002) 120 FCR 170 considered Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Applicant C (2001) 116 FCR 154 cited Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Gnanapiragasam (1998) 88 FCR 1 cited Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Thiyagarajah (1997) 80 FCR 543 applied but doubted Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Thiyagarajah (2000) 199 CLR 343 referred to Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf (2001) 206 CLR 323 cited NAAV v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2002) ALR 449 cited NAEN v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 216 cited NAGV of 2002 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 1456 cited NAGV v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 144 considered Patto v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs (2000) 106 FCR 119 cited Plaintiffs S157/2002 v Commonwealth of Australia (2003) 195 ALR 24 cited Rajendran v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs (1998) 86 FCR 526 followed Suntharajah v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1391 cited V856/00A v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2001) 114 FCR 408 considered V872/00A v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs (2002) 190 ALR 268 followed NAFG v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS N 1057 OF 2002 GRAY, RYAN AND GYLES JJ SYDNEY 17 JULY 2003
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate