Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Woodward v Repatriation Commission [2003] FCAFC 160 VETERANS' ENTITLEMENTS – Entitlement to pension – widow – veteran's death from asthma and other respiratory conditions – veteran sustained respiratory infection during operational service in World War II – respiratory infection led to asthma – whether death of veteran war-caused within meaning of s 8(1)(a) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (Cth) – relationship between ss 8, 13, 120, 120A and 196B – whether Statement of Principles ("SoP") for Asthma applicable to claim – whether observations of Full Court in Keeley v Repatriation Commission (2000) 98 FCR 108 obiter dicta – whether observations in Keeley correct – whether temporal connection between "occurrence" and operational service sufficient without meeting requirements of SoP VETERANS' ENTITLEMENTS – Entitlement to pension – claim by veteran for pension at Special Rate – veteran suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder ("PTSD") and alcohol dependence or alcohol abuse sustained during operational service in Vietnam – whether diseases war-caused within meaning of s 9(1)(a) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (Cth) – relationship between ss 9, 13, 120, 120A and 196B – whether SoP for PTSD and SoP for Alcohol Dependence or Alcohol Abuse applicable to claim – whether observations of Full Court in Keeley v Repatriation Commission (2000) 98 FCR 108 obiter dicta – whether observations in Keeley correct – whether temporal connection between "occurrence" and operational service sufficient without meeting requirements of SoPs – alternative submission – whether Administrative Appeals Tribunal erred in law in construing definition of "experiencing a severe stressor" in both SoPs too narrowly – whether material pointed to hypothesis that veteran "experienced" or was "confronted with" actual death or serious injury or threat thereof – whether Tribunal's decision affected by error WORDS AND PHRASES – "experiencing a severe stressor" – "experienced" – "confronted with" Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (Cth) ss 8(1)(a), 9(1)(a), 13, 120(1), 120(3), 120A and 196B(2) Repatriation Commission v Keeley (2000) 98 FCR 108 not followed Repatriation Commission v Deledio (1998) 83 FCR 82 followed Deledio v Repatriation Commission (1997) 47 ALD 261 referred to McKenna v Repatriation Commission (1999) 86 FCR 144 referred to Repatriation Commission v Law (1980) 31 ALR 140 considered Re Jenkin and Repatriation Commission (1997) 47 ALD 721 considered Repatriation Commission v Hill (2002) 69 ALD 581 considered Repatriation Commission v Hancock [2003] FCA 711 referred to Byrnes v Repatriation Commission (1993) 177 CLR 564 referred to Re Slattery and Repatriation Commission (1998) 52 ALD 90 not followed Bushell v Repatriation Commission (1992) 175 CLR 408 referred to O'Neil v Repatriation Commission (2001) 34 AAR 290 referred to Stoddart v Repatriation Commission (2003) 197 ALR 283 considered
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate