Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Tisdall v Health Insurance Commission [2003] FCAFC 198
COSTS – appeal – appeal dismissed by consent – indemnity costs DR PETER THOMAS TISDALL v HEALTH INSURANCE COMMISSION, DR ALAN JOHN HOLMES (as the Director of Professional Services Review), DR KENNETH NEVILLE (as Chairperson of Professional Services Review Committee no. 106), DR DAVID ROSENTHAL (as a Member of Professional Services Review Committee no. 106), DR NICHOLAS DEMEDIUK (as a Member of Professional Services Review Committee No. 106) AND DR LOUISE MORAUTA (as the Determining Officer) V 143 OF 2002 MADGWICK, FINKELSTEIN AND DOWSETT JJ 22 AUGUST 2003 MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V 143 OF 2002
ON APPEAL FROM A JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: DR PETER THOMAS TISDALL
APPELLANT
AND: HEALTH INSURANCE COMMISSION
FIRST RESPONDENT
DR ALAN JOHN HOLMES (as the Director of Professional Services Review)
SECOND RESPONDENT
DR KENNETH NEVILLE (as Chairperson of Professional Services Review Committee no. 106)
THIRD RESPONDENT
DR DAVID ROSENTHAL (as a Member of Professional Services Review Committee no. 106)
FOURTH RESPONDENT
DR NICHOLAS DEMEDIUK (as a Member of Professional Services Review Committee No. 106)
FIFTH RESPONDENT
DR LOUISE MORAUTA (as the Determining Officer)
SIXTH RESPONDENT
JUDGES: MADGWICK, FINKELSTEIN AND DOWSETT JJ
DATE OF ORDER: 22 AUGUST 2003
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The appeal is, by consent (except as to costs) dismissed. 2. The appellant is to pay the respondents' costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate