Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Dudzinski v Kellow [2003] FCAFC 207 BANKRUPTCY – appeal from sequestration order – whether fraud collusion or bias – whether denial of natural justice – whether bankruptcy notice valid - whether amount of judgment debt owing – whether court go behind judgment where challenge validity of bankruptcy notice dismissed and appeal unsuccessful – where court go behind certificate of taxation – whether bankruptcy notice founded on more than one judgment – whether counterclaim, set off or cross demand – whether service of petition – whether petition can be signed by a solicitor on behalf of petitioning creditors – whether affidavit verifying petition states whether an application has been made to set aside bankruptcy notice or extend time for compliance and whether decided – whether formalities of sequestration order complied with. PRACTICE & PROCEDURE – whether notice of appeal may be amended. PRACTICE & PROCEDURE – where adjournment sought. PRACTICE & PROCEDURE – whether leave be given to lead further evidence on appeal by way of cross-examination. Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) – ss 40(1)(g), 44, 47(1A), s 52, 52(1), 52(1)(b), 52(2), 52(2)(a), 52(2)(b), 86 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) – s 43 Federal Court Rules – O 20 r 2, O 52 r 21(1), O 52 r 36, O 62 r 6(3)(d), O 62 r 40, O 62 r 46, O 77 r 16(1), O 77 r 18, O 77 r 18(3), O 77 r 21 Makhoul v Barnes (1995) 60 FCR 572 cited Australian Workers' Union & Ors v Bowen (1946) 72 CLR 575 cited Owners of Strata Plan No 5459 v Mason & Anor (1999) 91 FCR 92 cited Stec v Orfanos [1999] FCA 457 cited Gye v McIntyre (1990-1991) 171 CLR 609 cited Day & Dent Constructions Pty Ltd (In Liquidation) v North Australian Properties Pty Ltd (Provisional Liquidator Appointed) (1981) 34 ALR 595 cited House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 cited Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd v Hubner [1999] FCA 1346 cited WALDEMAR DUDZINSKI v AYNSLEY KELLOW, ROY RICKSON, ERROL STOCK, BILL HOGARTH, CORDIA CHU, KEES HULSMAN, LYN HOLMAN, COLIN McANDREW, JOHN SCOTT AND GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY Q 31 OF 2003
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate