Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Herald & Weekly Times Limited v Gregory D Williams
(formerly identified as VAI) [2003] FCAFC 217 PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for leave to appeal by the media against a suppression order prohibiting publication of the name or identity of an applicant in a proceeding in the Court – suppression order made by the primary judge to give "practical effect" to a suppression order made by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal – whether the order was necessary in order to prevent prejudice to the administration of justice - whether embarrassing and damaging publicity to an applicant if a suppression order were not made can justify the making of such an order Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) s 14ZZE Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 35 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 17(1) and 50 VAI v Forgie [2003] ATC 4263 – cited The Herald and Weekly Times Ltd v Braun [1994] 1 VR 705 - cited Commonwealth v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (2000) 98 FCR 31 - applied Mirror Newspapers Ltd v Waller (1985) 1 NSWLR 1 – cited John Fairfax & Sons Ltd v Police Tribunal of New South Wales (1986) 5 NSWLR 465 – cited Re Bromfield, Stipendiary Magistrate; Ex parte West Australian Newspapers Ltd (1991) 6 WAR 153 – cited John Fairfax Group Pty Ltd (Receivers and Managers Appointed) v Local Court of New South Wales (1991) 26 NSWLR 131 – considered Decor Corporation Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc (1991) 33 FCR 397 - cited Gallo v Dawson (1990) 93 ALR 479 at 480 – cited Re Commonwealth of Australia; Ex parte Marks (2000) 177 ALR 491 – cited Engler v Commissioner of Taxation [2002] FCA 620 - cited SRD v Australian Securities Commission (1994) 52 FCR 187 - considered Australian Broadcasting Commission v Parish (1980) 29 ALR 228 - cited Russell v Russell (1976) 134 CLR 495 - considered J v L & A Services Pty Ltd [1995] 2 Qd R 10 - cited The Herald and Weekly Times Ltd v The Magistrates' Court of Victoria [1999] 2 VR 672 - cited The Herald and Weekly Times Ltd v Medical Practitioners Board of Victoria [1999] 1 VR 267 – cited Scott v Scott [1913] AC 417 – considered Johnston v Cameron (2002) 195 ALR 300 - cited VZZ v Australian Sports Drug Agency [2001] FCA 816 – disapproved THE HERALD AND WEEKLY TIMES LIMITED v GREGORY D WILLIAMS (FORMERLY IDENTIFIED AS VAI) V 123 of 2003 FINN, MERKEL AND STONE JJ 10 SEPTEMBER 2003 MELBOURNE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate