Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Long v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs
[2003] FCAFC 218
MIGRATION – cancellation of visa under s 501 of Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – whether signed Departmental Briefing Paper was a written notice setting out the reasons for the decision made – Briefing Paper indicated that cancellation of appellant's visa and removal of him from Australia would not have a detrimental effect on his children – no consideration of what were the best interests of those children – no notice given to appellant of any intention to take that course – jurisdictional error established.
MIGRATION – constitutional law – British subject resident in Australia since 1981 – whether respondent had the constitutional power to cancel his visa – whether appellant an "alien" – appellant sought declaration of right – appeal on this point further reserved until delivery of judgment by High Court of Australia in Shaw v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs.
Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s 501 NAAV v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCAFC 228 referred to Re Patterson; Ex parte Taylor [2001] HCA 51 referred to Nolan v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1988) 165 CLR 178 referred to Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Teoh (1995) 183 CLR 273 referred to Wan v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2000) 107 FCR 133 referred to Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v W157/00A [2000] FCAFC 281 referred to Ayan v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 7 Re Ruddock, Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Truong, 22 March 2001, unreported (HC) referred to Adams v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 552 referred to Ruhl v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 648 referred to Javillonar v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 854 referred to Diep v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1130 referred to Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v VFAD of 2002 [2002] FCAFC 390 followed NAMU of 2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCAFC 401 distinguished
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate