Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Birdseye v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2003] FCAFC 232 PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – appeal under s44(3) of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) - refusal by the Deputy President of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal to extend time to apply for review of a decision of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission – whether notice of appeal complies with Order 53 rule 3 of the Federal Court Rules – way in which a question of law should be framed ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – appeal under s44(3) of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) - refusal by the Deputy President of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal to extend time to apply for review of a decision of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission – whether the decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal was affected by legal error. Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) ss 29, 44 Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) s 33 Federal Court Rules Order 53 Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321 cited Australian Telecommunications Corporation v Lambroglou (1990) 12 AAR 515 followed Birdseye v Companies Auditors and Liquidators Disciplinary Board [2002] 20 ACLC 805 cited Birdseye v Companies Auditors and Liquidators Disciplinary Board [2002] FCAFC 284 cited Clements v Independent Indigenous Advisory Committee [2003] FCAFC 143 referred to Collector of Customs v Agfa-Gevaert Ltd (1996) 186 CLR 389 cited Collector of Customs v Pozzolanic Enterprises Pty Ltd (1993) 43 FCR 280 cited Drake v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1979) 24 ALR 577 referred to House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 cited In the matter of National Roads and Motorists' Association Ltd [2003] FCAFC 206 cited Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Limited (1986) 162 CLR 24 referred to Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Bhardwaj (2002) 209 CLR 597 referred to Norbis v Norbis (1986) 161 CLR 513 cited Re Birdseye and Companies, Auditors and Liquidators Disciplinary Board 39 ACSR 414 cited TNT Skypak International (Aust) Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1988) 82 ALR 175 followed NICHOLAS BIRDSEYE v AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES AND INVESTMENTS COMMISSION S 399 of 2003 BRANSON, MARSHALL and STONE JJ 21 OCTOBER 2003 SYDNEY (HEARD IN ADELAIDE)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate