Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Dagli v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 298
MIGRATION – decision by respondent to cancel appellant's visa under s 501(2) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – respondent had before him Issues Paper containing material adverse to appellant – appellant not informed of adverse material – denial of natural justice – respondent directed by primary judge during course of hearing to provide reasons for decision – respondent gave reasons but qualified them as being "best recollection" – primary judge concluded that statement of reasons demonstrated that adverse material had no bearing on outcome – whether primary judge gave excessive weight to statement of reasons – whether appellant required to prove "practical injustice" – whether respondent required to establish that breach had no bearing on decision Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 474, 501(2), 501(6), 501(7), 501G(1), 501G(4) Dagli v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 497 at [13]-[14], [38]-[39], [41], [49], [60], [71] referred to Ayan v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (2003) 196 ALR 332 discussed Water Board v Moustakas (1988) 180 CLR 491 at 497 referred to NAFF of 2002 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 52 at [41]–[46] considered Untan v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 69 at [97] referred to Commissioner for ACT Revenue v Alphaone Pty Ltd (1994) 49 FCR 576 referred to Re Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs; ex parte Palme (2003) 201 ALR 327 applied Kioa v West (1985) 159 CLR 550 cited WAEJ v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 188 at [41] referred to Re Ruddock, Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs; ex parte Truong (2001) 202 ALR 305 referred to Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs v W157/00A (2002) 72 ALD 49 followed NARV v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 262 at [16]-[18] referred to Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth of Australia (2003) 195 ALR 24 considered Re Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs; ex parte Lam (2003) 195 ALR 502 distinguished Re Ruddock; ex parte S154/2002 (2003) 201 ALR 437 considered Tuncok v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 1069 at [34] followed Ranginui v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 1280 followed Re Refugee Review Tribunal; ex parte Aala(2000) 204 CLR 82 applied Stead v State Government Insurance Commission (1986) 161 CLR 141 applied WACO v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 171 at [57] followed Re Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs; ex parte Applicants S134/2002 (2003) 195 ALR 1 referred to VBAC v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 205 referred to ATILLA DAGLI v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS N648 of 2003 LEE, GOLDBERG & WEINBERG JJ 19 DECEMBER 2003 SYDNEY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate