Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SHJB v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs
[2003] FCAFC 303
IMMIGRATION – cancellation of visa – failure to answer correctly questions on application form – Refugee Review Tribunal found that appellant had so failed – primary judge found that there was material before the Tribunal which justified its conclusion – whether primary judge erred in failing to decide, on the material before him, whether the appellant had in fact failed correctly to answer the relevant questions – whether that fact was a jurisdictional fact or whether the Tribunal's decision about non-compliance was the relevant jurisdictional fact – whether the Tribunal's decision was unreasonable in the 'Wednesbury' sense – whether the Court may apply a test of "relative reasonable satisfaction" – appeal dismissed.
Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 101, 108, 109
Enfield City Corporation v Development Assessment Commission (2000) 199 CLR 135 referred to Timbarra Protection Coalition Inc v Ross Mining NL (1999) 46 NSWLR 55 distinguished Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Eshetu (1999) 197 CLR 611 applied R v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Ex parte Bugdaycay [1987] AC 514 referred to Chesterfield Properties PLC v Secretary of State for Environment [1997] EWHC Admin 709 referred to R v Lord Saville; Ex parte A [2000] 1 WLR 1855 referred to Plaintiff S157/2000 v The Commonwealth (2003) 195 ALR 24 referred to Reg v Secretary of State for the Environment; Ex parte National and Local Government Officers Association, The Times 2 December 1992 referred to SHJB v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS S533 of 2003 CARR, FINN & SUNDBERG JJ 17 DECEMBER 2003 ADELAIDE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY S533 OF 2003
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate