Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NAIS v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 1 MIGRATION – appeal from a decision of a single judge affirming a decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal where there was a substantial delay between the first hearing and the decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal – whether delay in and of itself between the hearing and the decision of the Tribunal amounts to a denial of natural justice – whether prejudice to the applicants can be inferred Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s 420 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), s 39B
Cobham v Frett [2001] 1 WLR 1775, referred to Fox v Percy (2003) 1997 ALR 201, applied Craig v South Australia (1995) 184 CLR 163, applied Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Eshetu (1999) 197 CLR 611, referred to Re Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs; ex parte Lam (2003) 195 ALR 502, applied Application of New York, Susquehanna and Western Railroad Company 25 NJ 343, 136 A2d 408 (1957), referred to Holloway Sand & Gravel Company Inc v Department of Treasury 152 Mich App 823, 393 NW2d 921 (1986), referred to Gregerson v Board of Review of the Industrial Commission of Utah 841 P2d 720 (1992), referred to Helfand v Division of Housing and Community Renewal 182 Misc 2d 1, 696 NYS2d 630 (1999), referred to Harris v District of Columbia Commission on Human Rights 562 A2d 625 (1989), referred to Master Craft Engineering Inc v Department of Treasury 141 Mich App 56, 366 NW 2d 235 (1985), referred to Muin v Refugee Review Tribunal (2002) 190 ALR 601, referred to Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355, referred to Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth of Australia [2003] HCA 2, (2003) 195 ALR 24, referred to NAAG of 2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 713; (2002) 195 ALR 207, referred to NAIS, NAIT AND NAIU v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS N 546 OF 2003 HILL, MARSHALL AND FINKELSTEIN JJ 11 FEBRUARY 2004 SYDNEY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate