Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Nguyen v Minister for Immigration, Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 19 MIGRATION – cancellation of visa – whether Issues document prepared by Department constituted Minister's reasons for decision – whether Minister in jurisdictional error for failing to take into account best interests of the children – whether Minister failed to consider children's position if they did not accompany applicant to Vietnam – no error in rejection of assertion of jurisdictional error Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 474, 501(2), 501G(1)(e), 501G(4) Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth of Australia (2003) 195 ALR 24 referred to Coulton v Holcombe (1986) 162 CLR 1 cited Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v W157/00A (2002) 72 ALD 49 referred to VAN SON NGUYEN v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION, MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS No W 186 of 2003 SPENDER, BRANSON, STONE JJ PERTH 13 FEBRUARY 2004
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY W 186 OF 2003
ON APPEAL FROM A SINGLE JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA BETWEEN: VAN SON NGUYEN
APPELLANT
AND: THE MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION, MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGES: SPENDER, BRANSON, STONE JJ
DATE OF ORDER: 13 FEBRUARY 2004
WHERE MADE: PERTH
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The appeal be dismissed. 2. The appellant pay the respondent's costs.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY W 186 OF 2003
ON APPEAL FROM A SINGLE JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA BETWEEN: VAN SON NGUYEN
APPELLANT
AND: THE MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION, MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate