Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Applicant S214 of 2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 66 ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – Procedural fairness – Confidentiality orders made by administrative tribunal – Content of duty of tribunal nonetheless to provide procedural fairness – Whether tribunal provided procedural fairness in this case – Appeal to Administrative Appeals Tribunal against decision of Minister's delegate that Convention relating to the Status of Refugees did not apply to him on account of war crimes and crimes against humanity allegedly committed by him – Failure of Tribunal to require particulars of alleged conduct – Exclusion of appellant and his solicitor from discussion concerning particulars between Tribunal member and solicitor for Minister – Failure of Tribunal to notify appellant prior to decision of substance of identification evidence given in absence of appellant and his solicitor. Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 91X, 500 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees (1951) Article 1F Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) ss 35, 39(1) APPLICANT S214 of 2002 v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS and ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL N 1555 of 2003 WILCOX, MOORE and MARSHALL JJ 26 MARCH 2004 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 1555 of 2003
ON APPEAL FROM A JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: APPLICANT S214 of 2002
APPELLANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
FIRST RESPONDENT
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
SECOND RESPONDENT JUDGES: WILCOX, MOORE and MARSHALL JJ
DATE OF ORDER: 26 MARCH 2004
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate