Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Scott v Pedler [2004] FCAFC 67 SOCIAL SECURITY – appellant husband and wife litigants in person – respondent officers of Department of Social Security – earlier unsuccessful social security proceedings brought in Federal Court by same appellants against Secretary, Department of Social Security – causes of actions in earlier proceedings misconceived similar circumstances the subject of present proceedings – alleged breach of duty of care – alleged breaches of procedural fairness – alleged breaches of statutory duty – alleged causes of action involving intentional infliction of harm – 29 grounds of appeal together with 27 sub-grounds – findings of fact by primary judge as to reasonableness of conduct and absence of any vitiating conduct on the part of respondents – no errors of fact or law on part of primary judge – causes of actions misconceived in any event – adverse observations on conduct of appellants in bringing proceedings and misusing Court's resources – absence of deterrent of costs orders made against impecunious litigants
Social Security Act 1991 (Cth) ss 23(1), 94, 200, 106 to 108, 113-114, 116, 118, 729, 733, 740-743, 744-748, 1239-1243, 1247, 1283, 1296 and 1338 Scott v Pedler [2003] FCA 650 Scott and Another v Secretary, Department of Social Security (2002) 65 ALD 79 Ainsworth v Criminal Justice Commission (1992) 175 CLR 564 Byrne v Australian Airlines Ltd (1995) 185 CLR 410 Cubillo v Commonwealth (No 2) 103 FCR Crimmins v Stevedoring Industry Finance Committee (1999-2000) 200 CLR 1 Sullivan v Moody (2001) 207 CLR 562 Graham Barclay Oysters Pty Ltd v Ryan and Others (2002) 211 CLR 540 Shaddock & Associates Pty Ltd v Parramatta City Council (No 1) (1981) 150 CLR 225 Shaddock & Associates Pty Ltd v Parramatta City Council (No 1) (1981) 150 CLR 225 Sanders v Snell (1998) 196 CLR 329 Tahche v Abboud [2002] VSC 42 Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs v Hamsher (1992) 35 FCR 359 Cabal v United Mexican States (2001) 108 FCR 311 Sydneywide Distributors Pty Ltd v Red Bull Australia Pty Ltd [2002] 55 IPR 354 RALPH SCOTT AND SOPHIE SCOTT v OFFICER TONI LEE-ANNE PEDLER, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SECURITY, OFFICER JULIE A WILLIAMS, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SECURITY, AUTHORISED REVIEW OFFICER ROBERT A CHRYSTAL, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SECURITY V 546 OF 2003 GYLES, CONTI AND ALLSOP JJ 26 MARCH 2004 SYDNEY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate