Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WAIJ v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 74 MIGRATION – application to Federal Magistrates Court for prerogative writs to quash decision of Refugee Review Tribunal that appellant not be granted a protection visa – Tribunal not satisfied that material corroborating appellant's claims was not fabricated – no relevant findings of fact – role of Tribunal in conducting a review under the Migration Act. Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 13, 14, 36(3)-(7), 65(1), 189, 196, 414, 415, 416, 430, 474 Federal Court Rules O 80 Constitution s 75(v)
Abebe v Commonwealth (1999) 197 CLR 510 cited Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321 cited Chan Yee Kin v Minister For Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1989) 169 CLR 379 cited Corporation of the City of Enfield v Development Assessment Commission (2000) 199 CLR 135 cited Dranichnikov v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2003) 197 ALR 389 cited Hill v Green (1999) 48 NSWLR 161 cited Karanakaran v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2000] 3 All ER 449 cited Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Guo (1997) 191 CLR 559cited Kopalapillai v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs (1998) 86 FCR 547 cited Meadows v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs (1998) 90 FCR 370 cited Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 cited Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Eshetu (1999) 197 CLR 611 cited Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Applicant S20/2002 (2003) 198 ALR 59cited Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf (2001) 206 CLR 323 cited NAAV v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (2002) 123 FCR 298 referred to Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth of Australia (2003) 211 CLR 476 referred to R v Higher Education Funding Council, ex parte Institute of Dental Surgery [1994] 1 WLR 242 cited WACO v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 171 cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate