Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Derek George Shephard v Chiquita Brands South Pacific Limited [2004] FCAFC 76 BANKRUPTCY – Power to extend time for compliance with a bankruptcy notice under s 41(6A) – Creditor's petition presented more than 6 months after act of bankruptcy - Application to extend time made by creditor – The proceedings to set aside the bankruptcy notice were concluded and no longer on foot STATUTORY INTERPRETATION – re-enactment of a statutory provision – regard to context – the mischief sought to be addressed Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) s 33(1)(c), s 41(6A), s 41(7), s 44(1) Bankruptcy Amendment Act 1980 (Cth), s 24 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 28(1) Re Tavella (1953) 16 ABC 166 Re Moss; Ex parte Tyaraf Pty Ltd [1985] FCA 403 Re Halstead; Ex parte Westpac Banking Corporation (No2) (1991) 32 FCR 394 Lennon v Gibson and Howes Ltd [1919] AC 709 Re Young; Ex parte Smith (1985) 59 ALR 385 Howarth v Mortgage Acceptance Nominees Limited (1993) 43 FCR 587 State Bank of NSW v Gomez [2002] FCA 1476 Re Sterling, Ex parte Esanda Ltd (1980) 30 ALR 77 Re Udowenko; Ex parte Mitchell (1996) 69 FCR 299 CIC Insurance Ltd v Bankstown Football Club Ltd (1995) 187 CLR 384 McLean v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (1993) 42 FCR Streimer v Tamas (1981) 37 ALR 211 Ebert v Union Trustee Co of Australia Ltd (1961) 105 CLR 327 Guss v Johnstone (2000) 171 ALR 598 James v Abrahams (1981) 34 ALR 657 Re Lentini; Ex parte Lentini v CSR Limited (1991) 29 FCR 363 Re Hanby; Ex parte Flemington Central Spares Pty Ltd (1967) 10 FLR 378 Re Hayes; Ex parte Thomas Borthwick & Sons (Australasia) Ltd (1970) 18 FLR 216 Commissioner for Railways (NSW) v Cavanough (1935) 53 CLR 220 Wilde v Australian Trade Equipment Co Pty Ltd (1981) 145 CLR 590
Pearce and Geddes Statutory Interpretation in Australia, Butterworths, Australia, 2001 K Mason and J W Carter, Restitution Law in Australia (1995) D M Gordon, "Effect of Reversal of Judgment on Acts Done Between Pronouncement and Reversal" (1958) 74 LQR 517 DEREK GEORGE SHEPHARD V CHIQUITA BRANDS SOUTH PACIFIC LIMITED N915 of 2003 HILL, SACKVILLE AND MARSHALL JJ 31 MARCH 2004 SYDNEY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate