Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Tamawood Limited v Henley Arch Pty Ltd [2004] FCAFC 78 COPYRIGHT – copyright in plans and drawings of project home and in home built in conformity with them – infringement – "substantial part" – meaning – quality rather than quantity – nature of quality which makes something a "substantial part" of copyright work in suit – alleged infringer intending to copy but to incorporate differences so that market would not associate the two plans – whether plans, viewed objectively, so similar that one reproduced the other or a substantial part of the other – role of appellate court in relation to primary judge's finding of striking similarity.
Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), ss 14, 21, 31, 36 S W Hart & Co Pty Ltd v Edwards Hot Water Systems (1985) 159 CLR 466 referred to Ladbroke (Football) Ltd v William Hill (Football) Ltd [1964] 1 WLR 273 discussed Kenrick & Co v Lawrence & Co (1890) 25 QBD 99 cited Dixon Investments Pty Ltd v Hall (1990) 18 IPR 490 cited LED Builders Pty Ltd v Eagle Homes Pty Ltd (1996) 35 IPR 215 discussed Eagle Homes Pty Ltd v Austec Homes Pty Ltd (1999) 87 FCR 415 discussed Designers Guild Ltd v Russell William (Textiles) Ltd [2001] FSR 113 discussed University of London Press Ltd v University Tutorial Press Ltd [1916] 2 Ch 601 referred to Hawkes & Son (London) Ltd v Paramount Film Service [1934] Ch 593 referred to Bradbury v Hotton (1872) LR 8 Ex 1 cited Chatterton v Cave (1878) 3 App Cas 483 cited Bramwell v Halcomb (1836) 3 My & Cr 737 (40 ER 1110) cited Autodesk Inc v Dyason (No 2) (1993) 176 CLR 300 discussed Data Access Corporation v Powerflex Services Pty Ltd (1999) 202 CLR 1 discussed Kipling v Genatosan Ltd [1917-1923] MacG CC 203 cited G Ricordi & Co (London) Ltd v Clayton & Waller Ltd [1928-1935] MacG CC 154 cited Dixon Investments Pty Ltd v Hall (1990) 18 IPR 481 cited Collier Constructions Pty Ltd v Foskett Pty Ltd (1990) 19 IPR 44 cited Collier Constructions Pty Ltd v Foskett Pty Ltd (1991) 20 IPR 666 cited Network Ten Pty Ltd v TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd [2004] HCA 14 cited Blackie & Sons Ltd v Lothian Book Publishing Co Pty Ltd (1921) 29 CLR 396 cited Accounting Systems 2000 (Developments) Pty Ltd v CCH Australia Ltd (1993) 42 FCR 470 referred to Desktop Marketing Systems Pty Ltd v Telstra Corporation Ltd (2002) 192 ALR 433 cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate