Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NAEB v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 79 MIGRATION – appeal from primary judge dismissing application for judicial review of Refugee Review Tribunal decision – whether the Refugee Review Tribunal asked the wrong question when considering whether the consequences of a return to the People's Republic of China would constitute persecution of the appellant – whether proper question was why the appellant would modify his practice of Falun Gong - whether question would reveal the appellant had a well founded fear of persecution PROCEDURE – new ground of appeal raised – whether appropriate for Court to entertain ground where based on an authoritative determination of the High Court delivered between decision of primary judge and hearing of appeal. Appellant S395/2002 v The Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2003) 203 ALR 112; (2003) 78 ALJR 180; [2003] HCA 71 distinguished Chan v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1989) 169 CLR 379 Dranichnikov v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2003) 77 ALJR 1088 H v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2000) 63 ALD 43; [2000] FCA 1348 cited Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Guo (1997) 191 CLR 559 VACC v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 74 cited NAEB v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS N 909 OF 2003 NORTH, DOWSETT AND LANDER JJ MELBOURNE (HEARD IN SYDNEY) 30 MARCH 2004
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 909 OF 2003
On Appeal from a Single Judge of the Federal Court of Australia
BETWEEN: NAEB
APPELLANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate