Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VHAP of 2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 82 MIGRATION – application for protection visa – Tribunal did not invite applicant to comment on certain general country information relied upon by Tribunal – whether such information required to be provided by s 424A of the Migration Act MIGRATION – application for protection visa – procedural fairness – Tribunal failed to disclose to applicant all general country information relied upon by Tribunal – applicant does not establish how the information would have been dealt with – whether failure to disclose disputed information constituted breach of natural justice – whether any breach of natural justice constituted reviewable error in the circumstances of the case Migration Act 1958, s 424A Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf (2001) 206 CLR 323 applied NANM and NANN of 2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 99 followed NARV v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2003) 203 ALR 494 doubted Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex Parte "A" (2001) 185 ALR 489 applied Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Lam (2003) 195 ALR 502 applied Re Refugee Tribunal; Ex parte Aala (2000) 204 CLR 82 referred to Rezaei v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1294 applied SBBS v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCAFC 361 referred to Stead v State Government Insurance Commission (1986) 161 CLR 141 referred to Thirukkumar v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCAFC 268 applied VHAJ v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 186 75 ALD 609 followed VHAP of 2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 448 affirmed VHAP OF 2002 v THE MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS V 443 OF 2003 GYLES, CONTI AND ALLSOP JJ 31 MARCH 2004 SYDNEY (HEARD IN MELBOURNE)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate