Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WAHP v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 87 MIGRATION – application to Federal Magistrates Court for prerogative writs to quash decision of Refugee Review Tribunal that appellant not be granted a protection visa – Tribunal found letter corroborating appellant's claims was fabricated – whether jurisdictional error in Tribunal process. Judiciary Act 1903 39B Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 13, 14, 65(1), 189, 196, 427(1)(d), 430, 474 Abebe v Commonwealth (1999) 197 CLR 510 cited Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321 cited Chan Yee Kin v Minister For Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1989) 169 CLR 379 cited Corporation of the City of Enfield v Development Assessment Commission (2000) 199 CLR 135 cited Dranichnikov v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2003) 197 ALR 389 cited Hill v Green [1999] 48 NSWLR 161 cited Karanakaran v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2000] 3 All ER 449 cited Meadows v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs (1998) 90 FCR 370 cited Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Applicant S20/2002 (2003) 198 ALR 59cited Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Eshetu (1999) 197 CLR 611 cited Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Guo (1997) 191 CLR 559 cited Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 cited Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Rajamanikkam (2002) 190 ALR 402 cited Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf (2001) 206 CLR 323 cited NAAV v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (2002) 123 FCR 298 referred to Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth of Australia (2003) 211 CLR 476 referred to Re Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs; Ex parte Lam (2003) 195 ALR 502 cited Re Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs, Ex parte Palme (2003) 201 ALR 327 cited Re: Refugee Review Tribunal; Ex parte Aala (2000) 204 CLR 82 cited R v Higher Education Funding Council, ex parte Institute of Dental Surgery [1994] 1 WLR 242 cited WACO v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003]FCAFC 17 cited WAEJ v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 188 cited WAGU v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 912 cited WAJR v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 106 cited W157/00A v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs (2001) 190 ALR 55 cited WAHP v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS W310 OF 2002 LEE, CARR & TAMBERLIN JJ 14 APRIL 2004 PERTH
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate