Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NAPE v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 118 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B Migration Act 1958 (Cth) Kioa v West (1985) 159 CLR 550 NCAP v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2003] FCA 499 Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Eshetu (1999) 197 CLR 611 NAPE and NAPQ v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS N1792 of 2003 RYAN, FRENCH and RD NICHOLSON JJ 10 MAY 2004 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N1792 OF 2003
ON APPEAL FROM A SINGLE JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: NAPE
NAPQ
APPELLANTS
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGES: RYAN, FRENCH and RD NICHOLSON JJ
DATE OF ORDER: 6 MAY 2004
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The appeal be dismissed. 2. The appellants pay the respondent's costs of the appeal. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N1792 OF 2003
ON APPEAL FROM A SINGLE JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: NAPE
NAPQ
APPELLANTS
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGES: RYAN, FRENCH and RD NICHOLSON JJ
DATE: 10 MAY 2004
PLACE: SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
the court: 1 The appellants appeal from the decision of Hill J given on 21 October 2003 in which he dismissed their application. The application was one brought in reliance on s 39B of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) seeking judicial review of the decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal ('the Tribunal') which affirmed the decision of the respondent to refuse to grant to the female appellant ('the wife') a protection (class XA) visa which they had sought pursuant to the provisions of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ('the Act').
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate