Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Pratt Holdings Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [2004] FCAFC 122 TAXATION AND REVENUE – income tax – documents Commissioner of Taxation entitled to have access to under Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) s 263 – privilege claimed PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – legal professional privilege – whether privilege can attach to documents prepared by third party at direction of principal and returned to principal to then give to solicitor for purpose of obtaining legal advice – difficulty in determining dominant purpose of principal in instructing third party to prepare documents
Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth), s 236 and 263(1)
Anderson v Bank of British Columbia(1877) 2 ChD 644 discussed Ankin v London and North Eastern Railway Company [1930] 1 KB 527 cited Attorney-General for the Northern Territory v Maurice (1986) 161 CLR 475 cited Australian Rugby Union Ltd v Hospitality Group Pty Ltd (1999) 165 ALR 253 cited Baker v Campbell (1983) 153 CLR 52 discussed Balabel v Air India [1988] 1 Ch 317 discussed Bartram v Clark [1905] VLR 442 cited Belgravia Investments Ltd v Canada [2002] FCJ No 870 cited Birmingham and Midland Motor Omnibus Company Limited v London and North Western Railway [1913] 3 KB 850 cited Broad v Pitt (1828) 3 Car & P 518 cited Bunbury v Bunbury (1839) 48 ER 1146 cited Carter v Northmore Hale Davy & Leake (1995) 183 CLR 121 considered Commissioner of Australian Federal Police v Propend Finance Pty Ltd (1997) 188 CLR 501 considered Daniels Corporation International Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2002) 192 ALR 561 cited Dick Smith Electronics Pty Limited v Westpac Banking Corporation [2002] FCA 1040 cited DSE (Holdings) Pty Ltd v InterTAN (2003) 203 ALR 348 discussed Du Barré v Livette (1791) Peake 108 cited Esso Australia Resources Limited v Federal Commissioner of Taxation of the Commonwealth of Australia (1999) 201 CLR 49 cited FCT v Citibank Ltd (1989) 20 FCR 403 cited Grant v Downs (1976) 135 CLR 674 considered Greenough v Gaskell (1833) 1 My & K 98, 39 ER 618 discussed GSA Industries (Aust) Pty Ltd v Constable [2002] 2 QdR 146 cited Hartogen Energy Ltd (in liq) v Australian Gas Light Co (1992) 36 FCR 557 cited Health & Life Care Ltd v Price Waterhouse (1997) 69 SASR 362 cited Kennedy v Wallace [2004] FCA 332 cited Leader Westernport Printing Pty Ltd v IPD Instant Duplicating Pty Ltd (1988) 5 ANZ Insurance Cases 60-856 cited Learoyd v Halifax Joint Stock Co [1893] 1 Ch 687 cited Macedonia Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1987) 87 ATC 4565 discussed Minet v Morgan (1873) LR 3 Ch App 361 cited Mitsubishi Electric Australia Pty Ltd v Victorian WorkCover Authority (2002) 4 VR 332 cited Morlea Professional Services Pty Ltd v South British Insurance Company Ltd (unreported, Supreme Court of New South Wales, Foster J, 27 September 1984) discussed National Employers' Mutual General Insurance Association Limited v Waind (1979) 141 CLR 648 cited Nickmar Pty Ltd v Preservatrice Skandia Insurance Ltd (1985) 3 NSWLR 44 considered Parkins v Hawkshaw (1817) 2 Stark 239 cited Pearce v Foster (1885) LR 15 QBD 114 cited Preston v Carr (1826) 1 Y & J 175 cited Price Waterhouse (a firm) v BCCI Holdings (Luxembourg) SA [1992] BCLC 583 cited R v Bell; Ex parte Lees (1980) 146 CLR 141 cited R v Upper Boddington (1826) 8 Dow & Ry 726 cited Re Highgrade Traders Ltd [1984] BCLC 151 cited Reece v Trye (1846) 9 Beav 316 cited Southwark and Vauxhall Water Co v Quick (1878) 3 QBD 315 cited Taylor v Forster (1825) 2 Car & P 195 cited The Hopper (No 13) [1925] PD 53 cited The Palermo (1883) LR 9 PD 6 cited Three Rivers District Council v Bank of England (No 5) [2003] QB 1556 cited Three Rivers District Council v The Governor & Company of the Bank of England [2004] EWCA Civ 218 cited Trade Practices Commission v Sterling (1979) 36 FLR 244 cited Waldron v Ward (1654) 82 ER 853 cited Walker v Wildman (1821) 56 ER 1007 discussed Waterford v The Commonwealth of Australia (1987) 163 CLR 54 cited Waugh v British Railways Board [1980] AC 521 cited Wheeler v Le Marchant (1881) 17 Ch D 675 discussed Woolley v North London Railway Company (1869)4 CP 602 cited PRATT HOLDINGS PTY LTD (ACN 004 421 961) v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA V64 of 2003 PRICEWATERHOUSE COOPERS (A FIRM) v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA V 65 of 2003 FINN, MERKEL & STONE JJ MELBOURNE 12 MAY 2004
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate