Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Applicant A26 of 2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 185
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – appeal from decision of single judge refusing to grant an extension of time to bring application – leave to appeal – extension of time within which to seek leave to appeal – principles applicable on application for leave to appeal – where applicant originally sought protection visa – application denied – High Court remitted application for issue of constitutional writs to Federal Court – primary judge refused to grant applicant extension of time within which to seek issue of constitutional writs – where primary judge found application without merit – whether appropriate for appellate court to reconsider merits of claim. Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd (1981) 147 CLR 589 cited Applicant S422 of 2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 89 cited Arachchige v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 928 cited Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Lam (2003) 77 ALJR 699 applied Dambagolla Arachchige v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 121 cited APPLICANT A26 OF 2002 v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS S 827 of 2003 CARR, GYLES and LANDER JJ 14 JULY 2004 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY S 827 OF 2003
ON APPEAL FROM A SINGLE JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: APPLICANT A26 OF 2002
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGES: CARR, GYLES and LANDER JJ
DATE OF ORDER: 14 JULY 2004
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application for an extension of time within which the applicant has to seek leave to appeal from Mansfield J's decision is refused. 2. The application for leave to appeal against the decision of Mansfield J refusing an extension of time to institute the application and dismissing the application is dismissed. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate