Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Expectation Pty Ltd v PRD Realty Pty Ltd [2004] FCAFC 189
COURTS AND JUDICIAL SYSTEM – appeal – judgment at first instance delivered 22 months after appellant's witnesses gave evidence – judgment reserved for 17 months –excessive delay – duty of trial judge in those circumstances to give more comprehensive reasons – obligation to show that delay had not affected decision – appellate court required to take delay into account when reviewing findings – primary judge's reasons inadequate in several material respects – no findings in relation to alternative causes of action – re-trial ordered. Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), ss 82, 87 Fair Trading Act 1989 (Qld) ss 99, 100
Fox v Percy (2003) 197 ALR 201 applied Boodhoo v Attorney-General of Trinidad and Tobago [2004] 1 WLR 1689 referred to State Rail Authority of New South Wales v Earthline Constructions Pty Ltd (in liq) (1999) 73 ALJR 306 referred to Bartlem Pty Ltd Cox Industries (Australia) Pty Ltd [2002] FCAFC 224 referred to Hadid v Redpath [2001] NSWCA 416 applied R v Maxwell (unreported, New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal, Spigelman CJ, Sperling and Hidden JJ, 23 December 1998) applied Mount Lawley Pty Ltd v Western Australian Planning Commission [2004] WASCA 149 referred to NAIS v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 1 referred to Goose v Wilson Sandford & Co (unreported, England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Gibson, Brooke, Mummery LJ, 13 February 1998) applied Eckersley v Binnie (1988) 18 ConLR 1 applied Flannery v Halifax Estate Agencies Ltd [2000] 1 WLR 377 applied Customs and Excise Commissioner v A [2003] 2 All ER 736 referred to Digi-Tech (Australia) Ltd v Brand [2004] NSWCA 58 referred to Beale v Government Insurance Office of New South Wales (1997) 48 NSWLR 430 referred to Mifsud v Campbell (1991) 21 NSWLR 725 referred to Whisprun Pty Ltd v Dixon (2003) 77 ALJR 1598 referred to Federal Commissioner of Taxation v St Helens Farm (ACT) Pty Ltd (1980-1981) 146 CLR 336 referred to Housing Commission of NSW v Tatmar Pastoral Co Pty Ltd [1983] 3 NSWLR 378 referred to Laminex (Australia) Pty Ltd v Smeeth [1999] NSWCA 462 referred to Cordelia Holdings Pty Ltd v Newkey Investments Pty Ltd [2004] FCAFC 48 referred to Henville v Walker (2001) 206 CLR 459 referred to I & L Securities Pty Ltd v HTW Valuers (Brisbane) Pty Ltd (2002) 210 CLR 109 referred to John G Glass Real Estate Pty Ltd v Karawi Constructions Pty Ltd (1993) ATPR 41-249 referred to Bowler v Hilda Pty Ltd (1998) 80 FCR 191 referred to Heydon v NRMA Ltd (2000) 51 NSWLR 1 referred to Breen v Williams (1995-1996) 186 CLR 71 referred to Pilmer v Duke Group Ltd (in Liq) (2001) 207 CLR 165 Hospital Products Ltd v Unites States Surgical Corporation (1984) 156 CLR 41 referred to Maguire v Makaronis (1996-1997) 188 CLR 449 referred to Daly v Sydney Stock Exchange Ltd (1985-1986) 160 CLR 371 referred to McKenzie v McDonald [1927] VLR 134 referred to Mallesons Stephen Jaques v KPMG Peat Marwick (1990) 4 WAR 357 referred to Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Smith (1991) 42 FCR 390 referred to Blackwell v Barroile Pty Ltd (1994) 51 FCR 348 referred to Layton v Stewart [1994] ANZ Convenience R 283 referred to Australian Breeders Co-operative Society Ltd v Jones (1997) 150 ALR 488 referred to Clark Boyce v Mouat [1994] 1 AC 428 referred to Farrington v Rowe McBride & Partners [1985] 1 NZLR 83 referred to Bristol and West Building Society v Mothew (C.A.) [1998] Ch 1 referred to Youyang Pty Ltd v Minter Ellison Morris Fletcher (2003) 212 CLR 484 referred to Spincode Pty Ltd v Look Software Pty Ltd (2001) 4 VR 501 referred to Brickenden v London Loan & Savings Co [1934] 3 DLR 465 referred to Holmes v Jones (1907) 4 CLR 1692 referred to Potts v Miller (1940) 64 CLR 282 referred to Toteff v Antonas (1952) 87 CLR 647 referred to Gould v Vaggelas (1983-1985) 157 CLR 215 referred to Marks v GIO Australia Holdings (1998) 196 CLR 494 referred to Gates v City Mutual Life Assurance Society Ltd (1985-1986) 160 CLR 1 referred to Kizbeau Pty Ltd v W G & B Pty Ltd (1985) 184 CLR 281 referred to Wardley Australia Ltd v State of Western Australia (1992) 175 CLR 514 referred to Murphy v Overton Investments Pty Ltd (2004) 204 ALR 26 referred to Manwelland Pty Ltd v Dames & Moore Pty Ltd (2001) ATPR 41-845 distinguished Flemington Properties Pty Ltd v Raine & Horne Commercial Pty Ltd (1997) 148 ALR 271 doubted EXPECTATIONS PTY LTD v PRD REALTY PTY LTD and GORDON DOUGLAS Q164 of 2003 CARR, EMMETT & GYLES JJ 28 JULY 2004 PERTH (Heard in Brisbane)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate