Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Rahmatullah v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 200 MIGRATION – Tribunal found that appellant is not Afghani and has never resided in Afghanistan – application for one-way travel document to Afghanistan – appellant contends that Minister is bound by the decision of the Tribunal and cannot now rely on evidence contrary to its findings – distinction between the evidence before the Tribunal and evidence which is later provided to the Afghani government by the appellant – finding by primary judge that there was a real prospect of removal of the appellant in the reasonably foreseeable future Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 189, 196, 198 Al-Kateb v Godwin [2004] HCA 37 referred to M38/2002 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (2003) 199 ALR 290 followed Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs v Al Khafaji [2004] HCA 38 referred to Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs v Al Masri (2003) 197 ALR 241 referred to NATB v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 292 referred to SPKB v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 295 followed Ullah v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 60 cited
RAHMATULLAH v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS S 17 OF 2004 SPENDER, STONE AND BENNETT JJ BRISBANE (HEARD IN ADELAIDE) 17 AUGUST 2004
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY S17 OF 2004
ON APPEAL FROM A SINGLE JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: RAHMATULLAH
APPELLANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGES: SPENDER, STONE AND BENNETT JJ
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate