Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NAXN v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 221
MIGRATION – application for protection visa – newspaper articles referred to by applicant in course of Tribunal hearing – articles not provided to Tribunal – whether Tribunal under legal duty to call for articles in such circumstances
NAXN v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 71 affirmed Abebe v Commonwealth (1999) 197 CLR 510 followed Gomez v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2002) 190 ALR 543 cited Re Ruddock; Ex parte Applicant S154/2002 (2003) 201 ALR 437 applied NAXN, NAXO, NAXP and NAXQ v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS N 381 OF 2004 FINN, MANSFIELD and GYLES JJ 4 AUGUST 2004 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 381 OF 2004
ON APPEAL FROM A SINGLE JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: NAXN, NAXO, NAXP and NAXQ
APPELLANTS
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGES: FINN, MANSFIELD and GYLES JJ
DATE OF ORDER: 4 AUGUST 2004
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal be dismissed.
2. The appellants pay the costs of the respondent.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 381 OF 2004
ON APPEAL FROM A SINGLE JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: NAXN, NAXO, NAXP and NAXQ
APPELLANTS
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGES: FINN, MANSFIELD and GYLES JJ
DATE: 4 AUGUST 2004
PLACE: SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate