Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Applicants A105 of 2003 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 239
MIGRATION – appeal – protection visa – effective protection – relocation – where primary judge held the Refugee Review Tribunal was not in error in considering relocation and effective protection before inquiring whether the appellant had a well-founded fear of persecution. PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for adjournment pending High Court decisions – whether High Court decisions likely to affect outcome of appeal.
Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 36
Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Thiyagarajah (1997) 80 FCR 543 followed NAEN v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 6 cited NAHF v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 7 cited NAGV v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 144 discussed APPLICANTS A105 OF 2003 v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS; PAUL WHITE, MEMBER REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL AND PRINCIPAL MEMBER OF THE REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL SAD 59 of 2004 RYAN, JACOBSON and LANDER JJ 30 AUGUST 2004 ADELAIDE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY SAD 59 OF 2004
ON APPEAL FROM A SINGLE JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: APPLICANTS A105 OF 2003
APPELLANTS
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
FIRST RESPONDENT
PAUL WHITE, MEMBER REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
SECOND RESPONDENT
PRINCIPAL MEMBER OF THE REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
THIRD RESPONDENT
JUDGES: RYAN, JACOBSON and LANDER JJ
DATE OF ORDER: 30 AUGUST 2004
WHERE MADE: ADELAIDE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate