Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs v NAMW [2004] FCAFC 264
MIGRATION – application for a protection visa – whether country information was part of the reason for the decision – whether country information is non-disclosable information – whether failure to disclose country information resulted in a denial of procedural fairness
WORDS AND PHRASES – "information that is not specifically about the applicant or another person and is just about a class of persons of which the applicant or another person is a member".
Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 57 and 424A Baig v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 380 – cited Cooper Brookes (Wollongong) Proprietary Limited v The Commissioner of Taxation of the Commonwealth of Australia (1981) 147 CLR 297 – cited Kioa v West (1985) 159 CLR 550 – cited MacAlister v The Queen (1990) 169 CLR 324 – cited Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Al Shamry (2001) 110 FCR 27 – cited Muin v Refugee Review Tribunal (2002) 190 ALR 601 – cited NAHV of 2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2003) 129 FCR 214 – cited NANF v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 292 – cited NAOA v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 241 – cited NARV v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2003) 203 ALR 494 – not followed Re Minister; Ex parte PT (2001) 75 ALJR 808 – cited Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Miah (2001) 206 CLR 57 – cited Saraswati v The Queen (1991) 172 CLR 1 – cited Stead v State Government Insurance Commission (1986) 161 CLR 141 – cited VAAC v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2003) 129 FCR 168 – cited VAF v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2003) 206 ALR 471 – applied VEAJ v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 678 – cited VHAJ v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2003) 75 ALD 609 – not followed VHAP of 2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 82 – considered VNAA v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 134 – cited VUAX v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 158 – cited MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS V NAMW, NAMX AND NAMY N 423 of 2004 BEAUMONT, MERKEL & HELY JJ 23 SEPTEMBER 2004 MELBOURNE (HEARD IN SYDNEY)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate